Auto Racing Questions and Answers

Who is the greatest Grand Prix driver of adjectives time?

Answers:

Unquestionably Juan Manual Fangio; the cars were far more difficult to drive within his day and safekeeping was an afterthought at frequent of the circuits.
Anyone who has done a nouns at the old Nurburgring (in a road car) can appreciate the skill (and daring) involved when he powered an unwieldy Mercedes to feat there at the 1954 German Grand Prix.

senna

Stirling Moss.

probably schumacher..its harder to come first in the present day

Schumacher I reckon, although I hate to make a clean breast it. Senna was flawless in his sunshine.

stirling moss.

Michael Schumacher, beyond a doubt. There are only 2 or 3 adjectives time records he have not won yet and, if he doesn't announce his retirement at the ruin of next week and carry on into the next season, he should enjoy taken EVERY Grand Prix record.

I remember seeing Ierton Senna, Sterling Moss and Manuel Fangio when they be actually race (obviously no all at like peas in a pod time) and the things I know made them great are all a element of Michael's abilities...

Michael Schumacher is probably the best F1 driver ever or ever will be. It''s lately so sad that Americans enjoy never heard of him but they know who Dale Jr. is. and Dale Jr. or any other NASCAR driver... isn't qualified to shine Schumacher's driving boots.

Hakinen. Let down by Mclaren

SCHUUUMIIIIIII! He's thrilling beside his driving, and has made the sport a bit more interesting by cause a fair bit of controversy. Also, he wasn't a sore loser against Alonso.

Micheal because he drives a ferrari

Senna

I would own to say it is "The Mary Kay Lady". If she doesn't hold the Pink Caddy, she will have the Platinum Grand Prix. That will be me soon!

Debbie

I would hold to say Nigel Mansel

Senna and Prost are the greatest of adjectives time.

Alonso might go contained by the club of the greatest in a few years' time.

Schumacher is nowhere in the vicinity as great as the greats. His unsporting behaviour have spoiled his image for ever. When ethnic group will say "Michael Schumacher" after the German retires, they will read out "7 WDC's", but also "Adelaide 1994", "Jerez 1997", "Monaco 2006".

Michael Schumacher is untouchable, Too good for the others.

Ms. Eden

schumacher unsurprisingly

On paper, base on records, schumi is most successful but:
1.Senna be on a pace that would hold eclipsed even Michael if he have lived.
2. Mika Hakkinen always give michael very stiff competition - I own no idea why Mika gone F1 when he did. I think contained by equal cars Mika would have won.
3.Schumi is getting elder and with the youthful talent in both Raikkonen and Alonso they could eclipse Michael if they stay within F1 long enough.
4. Although juan instruction book fangio had more championship Sir Jackie Stewart and Alain Prost actually have more race win because they seasons be longer in the modern era (when the tires are fleshy and the drivers are skinny).

Mika Hakinen...unbelievable lower than pressure, and with the right domestic device, untouchable.

Scumacher and Senna are great cyborg drivers...NO CLASS

its got to be senna, untimely passing very in low spirits,not even schuey would touch him.

I would say that it would be Ayrton Senna. What a wonderful driver!!

I am a giant Schumi admirer for the reason that he drives wonderfully, holds a wonderful stride consistently, and seems to be more than competitive contained by watever machine he enter.

Michael Shumacher...

fernando alonso

SENNA

He was within a class by himself.

your all silly it is senna not schumacher

This is a exceedingly difficult question to answer. Looked at purely from a statistical point of outlook, nobody comes close to Michael Schumacher. The figures you can append to Schumacher's given name are so far ahead of any other driver that it is probably impossible that anyone will ever match his statistical history. There are more things to consider than statistics.

For raw speed it would be difficult to speak that Schumacher is the equal of or better than Ayrton Senna. Schumacher may have exceeded Senna's story of most pole positions but he has have many more Grands Prix contained by which to do so than Senna had. In other words, taken as a proportion of qualify sessions contested and pole positions earned, Senna comes out process ahead of Schumacher.

Senna's untimely death at Imola robbed us of the opportunity of have Schumacher and Senna race respectively other for a world championship. We, thus, will never know whether Schumacher is a better racer than Senna be.

If greatness requires honesty and sportsmanlike behaviour both Schumacher and Senna mark badly but Schumacher possibly worse.

In my view a great race driver emerges when he is challenge by drivers of equal driving ability. Save for the couple of years when Schumacher have to compete with Mika Hakkinen, Schumacher have not had to facade any real competition. If you consider the ding-dong Ayrton Senna/Alain Prost/Nigel Mansell years or the Niki Lauda/James Hunt battle or even the Gilles Villeneuve/didier Peroni fights, you take a better picture of what true Formula One competition is all roughly.

Add to all of this the reality that Formula One has changed spectacularly over the years and it becomes even more complicated.

In conclusion, as a result, the answer is: I do not know!

Want to find out if totalling an intercooler on a vehicle minus a turbo-charger help gain horsepower.?

Answers:

No HP gain at all beside naturally aspirated engines.

No, it doesn't.

I would contemplate it would, cooler air make more HP.

What you need is a cold nouns intake. All the intercooler will do is cause more restriction.

Intercoolers can oly cool nouns so much, with a easily aspeirated air, the atmosphere going into the engine is about the warmth of the outside air, so teh intercooler can not really cool it much, not satisfactory to make up the added restriction within the intercooler

But with a turbo/supercharged engine, the upper air is heated int eh compression process, so an intercooler can aid to cool that air, so it will pass noticable gains within power, gains that overcome the extra restiction

Any lowering of the air/fuel mixture will build it more dense, there by, offering a potential for more power. In totting up to cooling the air self taken in you can also cool the fuel. A fuel cooler resembles a life-size can with the metal fuel queue coiled inside it. Ice is placed in the can to cool the fuel. To optimize the engine, it should be tuned to use the denser mixture.

No, wont work. It will in actuality cause a restriction contained by the intake unless you have boost anyways. A short push intake is also a bad impression because you are drawing air form your engine compartment into the intake at a few hundred hundred degree. That's not cold air. Besides, no issue how big your intake is, the throttle body is still the same size, and merely that much air can enter, so..throttle body first, consequently a true cold air (inner fender intake), and you will own a gain.

p.s. If your car is OBD-II, be remarkably carefull with your choice on deeds products. If you put a "hot air" intake on your car, the vehicle have to run at 105-120 degrees surrounded by the intake. If you are sucking in hotter nouns than that, the engine will automatically retard the timing, and lessen the fuel into the chamber because the cylider is getting too hot for proper fuel vaporization.

Do you stipulation special tickets to grasp into the Paddock at Indianapolis Motor Speedway?

Answers:

to get into the garage pit nouns you need a pit outdo...
these are called hot pass and they have to own your credentials first

usually

You can buy Paddock passes. They cost closely of money and usually you need to know a sponsor or businessman to get them. Have you tried going to Brickyard.com?

I get my USGP Ferrari paddock passes through Ferrari San Fransico. But I know someone there. And remember...Expensive!