BaseBall Questions and Answers
Im 14 and i want to jump to a small college and play baseball i hold something like a 400 bat average and im appropriate contained by
Question:the field i play catcher and enjoy a good arm what are my probability goin to college
Answers:
A lot of college prospects are looking for size as much as anything else so it helps to be 6' elevated. As far as catcher goes you MUST own a pop time (that is the time the ball hits your mitt to the time it hits the fielder at second basis mitt) of under 2.3 second. If you can hit above .350 in a competitive giant school league near some amount of power while at the same time anyone a decent pitch blocker as very well as having the above pop time after you have a fully clad shot.
Virginia Wesleyan College in Norfolk, Virginia seem perfect for you.
do apt in college, lift weights within the off-season, play a ton of games, make the HS troop and either scouts will look at you and the conservatory will offer you a funding or you'll be able to way of walking on and try-out for the team.
University of Minnesota Duluth have a small baseball team i.e. very competitive
Your likelihood are very virtuous. Key at this very untimely part of your work is to keep your grades up. If you don't fetch the GPA to make the elevated school troop, you won't even get a look for college. Also, adjectives scouting reports contain a category known as "trade name up" where they are specifically looking for things approaching character, work ethic, excitement and desire. If you think your talent alone will get you notice, you're in for a surprise. I am a co-founder of a internally recognized chapter of a MLB-sponsored youth baseball program. 17 of my "kids" be drafted by major league team and over 70 are attending college on baseball scholarships. Good Luck! It sounds resembling you'll do well.
Is Roger Clemens on steroids?
Question:it may have save his career years ago near Boston
Answers:
Rodger was never big surrounded by college he was elevated and lanky, he have use them also, he is not dosliked like the others. I of late think any retire or play not wait until u see what troop can pay u afterwards have a progress of heart. Yes he and other pitchers have and will verbs too. The game is immediately about observation enhancement so they involve to just agree to them use and call it the rite enhancement era.
No...of late delusional to think that he can come stern and save the Yankees...I am a long time Red Sox adherent, and of course close to Clemens...Boston is where he started, but he is not the dominant pitcher he once be...
no he's head and body didn't expolde approaching barry he was other a big guy.
I don't think so he is an exercise freak.
i personly dont reflect that but then again you never know cuz he is antediluvian so i dont know how he is still playing
yes
no he is great pitcher he might be a little wash up although we will have to see
Clemens on steroids I doubt it, but I surmise his paycheck clearly must be. And what do the Yankees smoke that they think this be a good concept? Clemens doesn't want to be on a team, he a short time ago wants the paycheck.
nope freshly fat conceivably on cheetos
Roger is not on the juice and heres why. When players thieve steriods, their bodies get huge for the time self, but theres no way he took them because contained by the long term, steriods verbs a persons body and thus, he would not be able to throw 95 at age 45
lol
He's probably on deeply of legal juicer & pills, but I don't think steroids.
I bet the Old Fart's on Viagra though...you can only just imagine adjectives the ways to stay in shape using that :-)
I am confident that he is on some features of performance enhancing drug(s). Whether it be steroids, HGH, or an amphetamine (adderall), it's safe and sound to assume that most MLB players are currently or have within the past taken some sort of carrying out enhancing drugs.
What is with adjectives the steroid questioning of players that are adjectives hall of famers? Roger is freshly naturally big (chunky lately) and artistic my friend.
if u think that ur organizer and body have to explode to be sure that someone took steroids. ur wrong! look at the chronicle of players caught under the foreign mlb drug testing and look at their bodies. small guys thieve them too and show no side effects.
It's called excercising.
i don't regard as so
maybe Damon when he be with the Sox. he's like mad smaller now and so is his buddy Millar.
I'm not basically talking smack eithier
If Roger Clemens is on steroids... how could it hold saved his work in Boston?
I don't ruminate he's on steroids.
Hell yeah he is on steriods, din''t you hear when reporters have see that his head size and shoe size own grown over one week, they said that the never hapens, at a guy at his age
I remember seeing things on TV about his workout regimen when I be a kid groing up in MA, and the guy be just a horse. He worked his BUTT sour. I'd have to believe he'd be SO much more broken down if he did steroids. At 44 years old, playing at the rank he has for the duration he have, you really have to chalk him up as one of those freak of make-up types who can just play the heck out of the sport of baseball.
yes he is beyond a shadow of a doubt about it. im white and i say aloud if he were black they would be adjectives over him like barry. what roughly mark mcguire he is white and get a pass thats not right and as white relations we should be ashame
Well, although it is not as obvious as bonds i am sure he have used roids several times!
Nah. Rocket is a natural fathead.
No i dont expect he is.
In the stop who will turn down as the better pitcher Roger Clemens or Nolan Ryan?
Question:A friend and I can't agree!
Answers:
Presuming you meant "down contained by history", it's Clemens, and it really isn't close.
Ryan was a incredibly good pitcher who demonstrated excellence contained by some areas -- primarily strikeouts and not allowing hits, plus longevity, a superb work ethic, and beautiful mechanics -- but he have some serious holes in his team game (wildness and subsequent huge amounts of walks within the first half of his career) that glibly preclude serious analysts from annoiting him the best ever. Make no mistake, he's completely worthy of his Hall plaque, but when we're looking at some of the very best ever, fine but solid distinctions cannot be ignored.
Clemens is a dependably great pitcher. In areas where he doesn't comparatively match Ryan, the difference is slightly small, and in other areas -- and, again, the primary category is walking batter -- Rocket owns an enormous snake. Preventing baserunners is the first, most obvious step to preventing runs, and Clemens be (and is) significantly better at this than Ryan was.
Ryan. He be more dominant and his pitches regulary went over 100 mph. He is also the trade wins commandant.
Clemens I think is better overall. Ryan be kind of inconsistent on a game-to-game argument.
Also, Clemens pitched much of his career within an era of high-powered offenses. Ryan pitched largely in a defensive-minded era
Clemens
I'll say aloud Nolan Ryan hands down. I watch Nolan Ryan as I was growing up and here is no way surrounded by hell that Ryan would do what Clemens is doing every year. Ryan would never pitch half a year and constraint all sorts of money, solitary be on the team every 5th afternoon, and all this other BS Clemens get to do. I don't blame Clemens 100%, I blame team control for allowing it to happen, but I do blame Clemens for asking for it. I don't see Ryan ever asking for crap approaching this. Clemens act every year is starting to acquire real feeble. Either stay home or be with a squad from spring training, none of this 1/2 year crap, I'll only pitch for this troop or that team, be indebted you have a living.
roger"the rocket"clemens
I think that Ryan will travel down as the better pitcher but if Clemens didnt come back again he would probably be better. He is going to possibly ruin his stats this year and everyone will forget just about his career and focus on his concluding season. He is to old to be playing still.
No Contest : Roger Clemens
Major league pitchers bring back paid to win baseball games not rack up meaningless gaudy personal statistics.
Clemens .661W/L%
Ryan .525 W/L%
Seaver .603 W/L%
Nolan Ryan by far, give his team the best occasion to win every outing, pitched for his team no thing what, did not car for money other looked for the best situation to win a championship, While Clemens say the right thing but when looking at the earnings we all know that competition is not really on his mind. $$$$$
I think Clemens because of championship and cy youngs and controll. However if you were to use duplicate logic with this cross-question as bonds vs. mays or babe ruth, then it would hold to be Nolan Ryan because Clemens probably used steroids.
I think it's close really. On the one paw, Clemens has be the best overall pitcher, the wins and cy infantile awards speak to that. If you went on strikeouts, no hitters, arm strength, and aptitude to pitch deep into games while self 43, 44, or 45 years old or elder, then surely Ryan has it. Clemens is a 5 or 6 inning pitcher at best in a minute.
Still, I think Ryan win it just because of him knock Robin Ventura out with one punch approaching he did, that was classic!!
Nolan Ryan. He's the strikeout king, he be a tough pitcher, he was indistinguishable age in his final season surrounded by 1993 as Rogers Clemens is now, but he didnt enjoy any special contract that allowed him to basically pitch whenever he looked-for. He didnt take a couple years and pretty much come posterior when someone was feeling like to pay him like mad of money. He didnt sell out and sign next to the Yankees just so he could win a title fight. He won one championship surrounded by his whole art, but he never went to a squad that was leading just raison d`¨ētre he would get rewarded a lot. He be always trying to clear the team he be with a World Series sensation. The 7 no hitters is more meaningful than 7 Cy Youngs. 7 Cy Youngs only just proves that their werent as many pious pitchers when Clemens was in the lead his Cy Youngs and that other people thought he be the best pitcher, but to get 7 no hitters, you own to prove by yourself that you are the best pitcher. Nolan Ryan is the greatest pitcher of modern baseball. Rogers Clemens was great too, but he will other be second to Ryan.
Clemens, not even close. Sure, Ryan had more strikeouts and no-hitters, but if you want overall consistency, it's Clemens. Ryan have all those strikeouts, but still be only 32 games above .500 for his occupation. Clemens is well over .600.
More strikeouts and no-hitters don't necessarily be set to better pitcher. And what's more amazing, is that Clemens played most of his career surrounded by the steroid era, while Ryan played mostly in the '70s and '80s, when players be smaller and ball parks be bigger. Also, the fact that Clemens have all those Cy Youngs should describe you that he was great almost every year. And he have well over 4000 strikeouts and is second. Clemens!
I reflect your stats blurb just answered your sound out.
The choice is clear--Roger Clemens.
Unlike Ryan, he was the greatest pitcher of his era. . . .
I surmise Ryan...more strikeouts, and.....I think we will find out surrounded by the next few years that Clemens be a steroid user.
This is an idiotic interrogate. There isn't any way Roger Clemens even comes close to Nolan Ryan...I stingy come on! HE JUST GAVE UP 3 RUNS TO MY TEAM'S AA AFFILIATE!
I always close to Ryan. Tough, gritty, and the only power pitcher to final more then two decade, and he almost go 4.
I always insufferable Clemens, first because he was the merely good item that red sox fans ever talk about, and consequently because he left them.
That one said, 7 no-hitters is great, but it isn't 7 Cy's. (I thought it was 6) The Braves '90's Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz combined to bring back 5 together. And Ryans win/ lose is very bad(although he played on some really bleak teams)
I have to right to be heard Clemens for three reasons.
1. Both last as long, but Clemens has a much high winning percentage.
2. Ryan be wilder, and threw so many long cunts he put his infielders to sleep going after strikeouts.
3. Clemens have a better variety of pitchers.
They're both among the best and succeed contained by any ball park; but you could seize to Ryan early due to his wildness; but not to Clemens.
Clemens is also a better fielder, hitter, and underside runner.
Nolan Ryan is by far the better pitcher and he knew when he retired it be for good. He's not some mediocre lowlife trying to make the most money he could. He played for the love of the spectator sport and he had a long job but he is by far better then Roger Clemens. He have a fastball that no one can touch. Anyone who think Clemens is better is just fooling themselves. I don't precision that Ryan never won a Cy Young award he had 7 no hitters Clemens have 0. More strikeouts by far then Clemens. Who care if he had for a time control issues? By far Nolan Ryan was a better pitcher and even if he have started his career at like time as Roger Clemens he still would have be untouchable. In fact within 1977 he won TSN pitcher of the year. In 1990 Ryan threw a no hitter at the age of 43. Hmmmmm I don't see Roger Clemens coming close to throwing a no hitter. Sorry but hate to disappoint you but Clemens doesn't even hold a candle to Nolan Ryan.
Also for the guy who stated that Clemens be a better baserunner how many stolen basis did Clemens have 0 how masses did Ryan have 3 how heaps homeruns did Clemens have 0 how plentiful did Ryan have 2 . How heaps rbi's did Clemens have 12 how lots did Ryan have 36 hmmmmmm Better hitter is Ryan as economically.
Clemens...
OMG! Should Jim Leyland be fired?
Question:HE LOST! OMG, HE HAS A LOT OF NERVE LOSING THE FIRST GAME LIKE THAT! WHAT WAS HE THINKING? THATS IT THE TIGERS ARE IN LAST PLACE AND IT'S JIMMY'S FAULT! FIRE HIM NOW!
Ha! Okay, for those of you who dont know my dry sense of humor, get used to it.
Also, this would be a obedient time for all you whiney sux fan to hit me with your best shot!
Answers:
Tomorrows headline: "Yankees - Royals Enjoy Undefeated Status" "White Sox Crushed In Season Opener" "Is Ozzie On Thin Ice With Management?" "Schilling Shelled"
Yes, energy is good!!
Fire him
Haha, love it. You hit the staple right on the head. Being a Phillies adherent, I can tell you here are a ridiculous amount of people claiming the sky is falling after a tough pipe day loss. I guess you can write rotten the Tigers, Phillies, Red Sox, White Sox, Dodgers, and all the other team who lost their first game. I never really realize before today how abundant people overreact to losing the starter. Meanwhile, if the same spectator sport occurs surrounded by the middle of June, it's a disappointing loss, but you come right back tomorrow.
BTW, the Tigers enjoy always be my second-favorite team after the Phils. I would love to see a Phillies-Tigers World Series someday!
Way to run Georgie, you read my mine.
Yes they are in final.Even the Royals won.The Tigers are stuck in closing with the Sox.Fire him!
OMG. No.
LOL...yeah, OK.
What happen if he loses again and you go 0-2???
HA HA HA They LOST. No he Should not Be fired
He still have a team that can't pick the globe, but that's Dombrowski and not Leyland.
Hey, if they could pick it, they would have won that winter sport. Halladay wasn't at his best. Then again, neither was Bonderman. But giving up 12 hits, most of which should hold been picked will form any pitching staff look bad.
At smallest they lowered the LF wall. It would have be a blow-out otherwise.
You mean he wasn't after he give up the lead. LOL You are so right around nuts who go crazy after debut lose.
Resolved Questions