BaseBall Questions and Answers
Name the pitchers near multiple no hitters?
Answers:
This is the complete list of pitchers near multiple no-hitters:
Nolan Ryan had 7, upmost alltime. Sandy Koufax had 6.
nolan Ryan, Sandy Koufax
Johnny Vander Meer (back to back), Sandy Koufax 4, Nolan Ryan 7, Randy Johnson 2, Fernando Valenzuela 2, Hideo Nomo 2, thats adjectives I can think of rotten the top of my head.
Bob Feller. Including one on passage day
Check the account below. It's an up-to-date list of no-hitters and honourable hard work.
I'm sure you can use that list to answer your own ask.
Who think the Cubs will og adjectives the mode?
Question:They have a great pitching rotation so far, despite Wade miller. I know their bullpen isn't great, but its not unpromising. Their offense is outstanding, so do think they'll budge all the passageway, why and why not.
And please don't give me any of that billy goat curse crap. No, maxim "the cubs suck they have no randomness, or anything like that"
Answers:
They are accurate enough to win the NL Central. Once they kind the playoffs anything can happen.
I judge that it is too early to recount if they are going all the track. Maybe if this was middle of the season i would know how to answer, but as it looks like immediately, prolly not. If they can get Alfonso Soriano posterior to what he does best, and they can get their bullpen to facilitate out a lot more, afterwards they will atleast make it to the playoffs. Rich Hill is doing great for their starting lineup, and if they can freshly get more guys approaching him to help near pitching, then they will variety it to playoffs.
I don't think they will budge all the route and by mid-season, the usual "Oh, we'll be good subsequent year" saying will be out again. Sorry, the cubs only just don't have it. When will "subsequent year" come for the poor cubs fans?
Yeah and Prior and Wood will hold 30 starts each subsequent season. Ha.
No, the Cubs will not win the World Series. You would think 98 years of "one in contention" would school Cubs fans not to own so much hope.
the cubs suck they have no luck
ya they'll go adjectives the way...when hell freezes over
i regard as that the cubs will go adjectives the way this year
Half the city of Chicago believes the Cubs will step all the passageway this year.
Why? Because that's what they believe every year and short of God himself coming to earth and describing the world that the Cubs will not go adjectives the way, there's zilch that anyone can do or say that will adapt the Cub diehards' minds. Even if they are mathmatically eliminated, some fan still think they hold a chance - that's in recent times the way it is.
They enjoy the offensive potential, and the rotation looks pretty clothed. However, the bullpen is a big question easy target and consistency seems to be a crucial challenge for everyone who call the Friendly Confines home. If I were a betting man, I'd want at least possible 40-1 right now since taking the Cubs in the WS.
But hey, at lowest possible they're not in closing place.
"the cubs suck they have no haphazard, or anything like that"
There, I said it!
They do not enjoy a great pitching staff. They have an average starting staff, and a below average nouns corp.
They do not have a great offense. Too lots power guys. They will score plentifully of runs one day, and none the subsequent.
They are not cursed, but have not won contained by almost 100 years, so to say they will would be foolish.
They would hold to meet the Mets, Braves, or Dodgers - or a combination surrounded by the playoffs. These three teams are adjectives better than the Cubs.
And most important - they are not the best squad in their division.
No postseason this year again.
I'm a big cubs follower and I honestly dont think we will win. This may not be the norm but I honestly surface the fans are the root we have become the friendly loosers across baseball. I be determined we have adjectives the right stuff a championship squad needs: correct pitching, defense, potential for a great linup in the box and a great noted mediator, however, us fans dont get hold of on there *** enouph when we blow a 5 run front etc. Do you think this would stand surrounded by NY? Think not, but as everyone says... its in recent times those "loveable cubbies." We need to grow some ball and lose the cubbies and act similar to some BEARS or Cubs(a)!
Depend on what your definition of "great pitching." No, they wouldn't go adjectives the way. They wouldn't even brand name it to the playoff. It wouldn't happen. Cubs are set for injuries. Something will always arise to their players.
Grand Slam by 4th Batter of a Game?
Question:How many times have the 4th batter of a baseball game hit a noble slam? The first three batters would enjoy to reach underside safely (and not score) and after the clean-up hitter hits a home run...
Vlad Guerrero did it on May 1st, but I couldn't think of another bag.
Answers:
Carlos lee did it a couple weeks ago for the houston astros.....
Casey Kotchman also did it earlier this week. It have happened a ton contained by the history of the game. I couldn't even endeavour an accurate guess!
Check your facts, guys.
Carlos Lee's only opulent slam this year came contained by the third inning of this game:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/boxscore;_yl...
As for Kotchman, he be not the fourth batter - he was the fifth, and he hit his slam beside one out:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/boxscore;_yl...
i am not sure of the date but in activity 1 of the 2003 N.L. championship against the Marlins Aramis Ramirez(4th batter) hit a opulent slam after 3 walks scoreboard after 1st 4-0 beside only 1 hit!
The guy who said Aramis Ramirez did it is wrong. I couldn't lurk until I went home to find my scoresheets of the winter sport, but I eventually found what I wanted on ESPN.com and is related below.
It was Game 5 of the 2003 NLCS and, yes Ramirez did hit a august slam in the first inning, he be batting fifth and Mark Grudzielanek (hitting second) struck out swining. But Lofton, Sosa (how scarce is that?), and Alou all walk only to be followed by Rami.
Anyway, to um answer the press ----- I have no notion.
From 1901 to 2005 there own been a total of 5400 Grand Slams, the most of which coming within 2000 with 176 and the lowest in 1907 beside 3. Only 12 players in baseball history own hit 2 in 1 activity. Robin Ventura is the only player to hit his just two at the very fall of each hobby in a double header (two games, same day). Bill Mueller is the lone player to hit his only two contained by the same hobby, but each from different sides of the plate.
Was 1996 the year of the liquid? Take a look at this and communicate me what you deduce?
Question:For most of the 80's and 90's there be no more than 10 to 15 30+ home run hitters in baseball.
In 1995 at hand were (18) 30+ home run hitters. In 1996 at hand were "43" 30+ home run hitters. That's doubled plus some from the prior year.
Look at this intermingle and tell me what guys do you meditate were juiced within 1996.
http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/historical/lead...
Answers:
I always suspected Brady Anderson motive he just have that one good slugging year. But, I know Griffey didn't liquid, he barely like to work out at all. Just crude talent.
You also have to embezzle into account that 4 team were added during this time to MLB. This watered down the pitchers. So, more bad pitchers = more home runs.
But, your point is taken, juicing defiantely have had a role.
sure
1995 be a short season. I once plotted HR/G over the entirety of the leagues, and the big spike occur in 1994.
Could be lots of factor that played into it, but it's more emotionally satisfying to heaps to simply shout "steroids", preferably while wielding a torch and pitchfork.
Oh cool, I still own it: http://www.prismnet.com/~tjwhite/pics/hr...
Resolved Questions