BaseBall Questions and Answers
Orioles fans- What happen to BJ Surhoff?
Question:I know he went to the Braves, come back a season or so, where on earth is he now?
Answers:
"The Orioles decline to offer Surhoff arbitration for 2006. However Surhoff have not announced retirement despite the fact that he in a minute manages the Aberdeen IronBirds signaling that Surhoff may return to live play in the Majors."
he's unresponsive...
i dont know but brian roberts is soo hott!
i believe that he is on the DL
You don't have to be an Orioles lover for this one - he's effectively retired. He's 42 years old, played 19 season, and hasn't played since 2005. What more do you want from the man?
After spending 9 seasons surrounded by Milwaukee, primarily as a catcher, he went to Baltimore for 4.5 years. Was traded to Atlanta at the deadline. Spent 2.5 season there, the 2002 season primarily as a reserve. He moved out as a free agent after the 2002 season and signed with Baltimore. He retired after hitting singular .257 in 2005. He played at smallest every position except pitcher at least one hobby.
Does anyone consider that if Barry Bonds breaks the home run account he should be predictable as the narrative holder?
Question:Ok, Barry Bonds according to most was on steroids and beef up when he went and hit most of his home runs within the latter years, now, this is a view question, but do you regard as with adjectives the criticism and the speculation surrounding his steroid use he should be recognized as a lawful holder of the record when he breaks it? or is he lately another cheater who we should not recognize?
Answers:
Although I don't condone the 'roids, I still believe that the record will be legit. First sour, Barry was by no medium the only baseball player within the '90s who was taking steroids. A huge percentage be taking them. So, how come Barry Bonds is the only personality who's hitting this many homers this consistantly? why isn't everyone breaking the story? Because, steroids don't make someone a great baseball player-all they do is increase muscle growth. They do certainly nothing for your mechanics, your skill, or your hand-eye coordination. Barry Bonds have the some of the best coordination and mechanics in modern baseball history; that's why he's so well-mannered. Why do you think he's so difficult to strike out? Why have he hit over .300 so many times? Steroids didn't do squat here. No amount of steroids can make someone Barry Bonds; if they could own, they would have.
Hell No because he be already accused of using steroids so possibly he did and they are just supporting what he did so if he breaks it not a soul should really celebrate beside him. yeah ok he did it when it wasnt against mlb policy but he still used sime kind of steroids that his trainer give him and he admitted to it you can look it up at wikipedia.com and freshly put barry bonds
i think he should be notorious because it hasent even been proven that he did it and even if he did do it, he took the steroids when it wasnt agaisnt mlb policy at the time
when he does,as expected he should
Absolutely! I think that previously it is all over, we will cram that there be a lot of individuals taking steroids or using HGH and there will be a ton of pitchers on that register. Jason Grimsley will just be the first on a document of many. So what do we do? Go stern and only count the HRs vs the pitchers on steroids? Will we ever know?
Let's frontage it, he played in an era of steroids; you enjoy to recognize him as the transcription holder. But don't worry, A Rod is on tread to blow Bonds out of the water so it wont final long.
Bonds=Cheater
Look at the photos of him in his first season, and of him immediately. Major change ! No, we should NOT make out him. Why isn't anyone mentioning it's taken him twice as many games to manage these records ?
Wait a minute. He's close a record? Are you cetain? There's be an impostor surrounded by his uniform since the beginning of the '99 season, so how can you be consistent?
He did steroids. But when he hits 756, he'll be the record holder, but I would put a star as big as his ego right subsequent to his name.
yes i do
Well, you own to recognize him as the transcription holder, since we have no view how many homers he hit while he be juiced. And even if he did take steroids, that doesn't conversion the fact that he did hit adjectives of those homers, you can't just budge back and erase them from files. Baseball really doesn't have a choice; if he hits 756, afterwards he's the record holder. However, have said that, I HATE Barry Bonds. He is a cheater. He used steroids and then he come up with some bonehead excuse in the order of how he didn't know they were steroids when he took them instead of owning up to his mistake, only like every other player who have taken steroids. He will get credit for the story, but he doesn't deserve it. If I were a baseball planner, I would walk Bonds at smallest once every time I played the Giants, to protest him. If I was really smoking the Giants, I would meander him every time he came up to bat. Barry Bonds is a fraud and a cheater and I hope that after he gets the register, he is tormented every single day of his time with the comprehension of the fact that he CHEATED to break the most holy record surrounded by the most sacred winter sport in America.
He's never be caught so therefore should be the narrative holder if he breaks it
I would just close to to correct carl the tard. He said it took barry way more games...?? Barry have less at bat then Hank Aaron by a full-size margin. He will be the transcript holder and it should be recognized.
we should recognise him....but not as much as everyone else...
They are gona put him surrounded by the books but citizens will remember him as a cheater to get within.
yes. we just enjoy to acknowledge that 'roids are prevalent in sports. he is homeruns, and lots of em. besides a short one month term, how many homers did fellow roid rager ARod hit?
ppl surrounded by the NFL do roids all the time, and nobody cries roughly the sack record set by the lb for the Giants, or going on for Reggie White ect.
and getting a sack is a LOT harder than hitting a hr.
Speculation is not proof. He should and will be recognized as mlb's modern home run king.
i'm tired of this.
barry bonds has never tested positve nor admit to the use of steroids.
even the years he is accused of using, baseball have no rule against their use, and one would have to assume, most players be atleast trying them, and still no other hitter has posted these numbers. the playing pasture was even. he still outplayed the rest of the field.
i'm done. the journal is his. i'm done.
and you can't cheat if there is no rule against it. it's adjectives sense. he is not a cheater.
Wrong. Barry Bonds was never regard by most to be on steroids. The few who accuse him are motto he took HGH, not steroids. Bad question.
Yes, for one simple basis. The record book say "Most Home Runs, Career." Once Bonds hits 756, he will have the unbeatable number of career home runs contained by MLB history.
It won't change my judgment that Bonds is a jerk who probably used steroids. But history are not supposed to have an "oh by the way" clause. If Mark McGwire is identified for hitting the most HR in a season, Bonds must be agreed for hitting the most in his trade (once he passes Hank Aaron). It didn't assistance McGwire make the Hall of Fame, and I sure as heck hope it won't basement Bonds into Cooperstown either. But the dictation book is a list of statistics, not a subjective evaluation of who the best players are.
Best minus 3 HS baseball bat?
Question:its soooo confusing, maybe im newly reading into it all to much, what does everyone suppose of Nike Torque?
Answers:
watttt
my bro has the plasma and it is better
nike bat usually dont have as much "pop" as other better agreed baseball brands such as omaha, louisville slugger and easton. i personally use the louisville slugger cb004 armor
With the MLB motto that they will televise the first round of the Draft this year, will you study it?
Question:I am going to, and hopefully within the subsequent few seasons MLB will rehash their draft to allow trades and what not. I think that televise the first 3-5 rounds will make for suitable tv. What do you think?
Answers:
Televising the NFL and NBA drafts make far more sense than the MLB draft. First round draftees in football and basketball will be, surrounded by most cases, name players the subsequent year in the sport. MLB draftees, in opposition, will often embezzle years to make the majors. Baseball drafts are too much of a put money on to realistically make correct tv. Sure, being a soaring draft pick is great, but who is going to know many of these players? First round NFL and NBA draftees usually own been on TV pretty a few times, and their names are certain. But MLB draftees, many right out of giant school, might not even enjoy any video footage for television to show.
The MLB and NHL drafts are as much to stock their minor league with talent as they are to determine which troop gets which players. With trades of prospects adjectives, the draft means far smaller number in shaping baseball team than it does in football or basketball. The Mark Priors of the baseball world are few and far between; the time between anyone drafted and making the majors is too long for this to be relevant TV programming.
yeah.
yes
No I wont because the mlb/nba draft isnt as big as the nfl draft
I'll view.
the mlb draft is like no other professional sport
contained by the mlb draft you get the most busts but you take the most gems
personally im not going to survey it because there are just any players who can come in and facilitate
it takes profoundly of development within the minors so we probably wont see these players in more or less 3 years
most people can't first name the top 5 prospects which will make for a really long scrutinize unlike other sports where the ncaa have major box contracts and people are competent to become familiar beside the best players college baseball and minor league baseball are almost unseen.No fun to see if you don't know the players
I won't bother. 90 percent of the players drafted are not even known, agree to alone are going to even play for the team if they hold a chance to progress further. The NFL draft is over produced already, baseball is simply thinking of ideas to change in and try to be approaching the NFL.
ill scrutinize just because its single one round
No, but it will catch on. In a few years alot of those will be watching.
I won't because I won't know any of the players. The NFL Draft is a hit because we, as fans, grew up beside the players in college contained by rooting for them and following them. Outside of their families and those contained by their community, I don't see the MLB draft being as big of a hit because those players aren't particular that well internally.
I'm only going to see it until the Royals take their first pick, so I won't see too much of the first round.
It depends on the squad u like
Resolved Questions