BaseBall Questions and Answers
A dozen years ago, paleontologist Stephen Gould stated in that would never be another .400 hitter. Was he right?
Answers:
he was right, near will never be another .400 hitter. w/ the advance contained by technology now and the better level of competition, in attendance is no way a hitter can do it. if ted williams be at his peak today, im guessin his best avg season would of by a hair`s breadth made .300. pitchers nowadays throw the globe much faster and have much more movement within their offspeed pitches than before..
No. Someone will come along that will flout logic just approaching Tiger did with Golf.
he's right so far, but eventually here might be another .400 hitter, but it's not likely.
as long as in that is mlb he is wrong. as every year passes minus the 400 being broken, he is right.
No he be wrong. history repeats it self!
Never is a hard word to use within sports. It appears that with todays current crop of players 400 seem to be safe for a while. This one said, if Albert Pujols and A-Rod got traded to Colorado. Albert hitting 3rd and A-Rod protecticting him hitting 4th, I believe Pujols could hit 400. Other than this senario happening, I do not see anyone hitting 400 for a long while.
A dozen years ago, it be 1995, and we were of late coming off a strike-shortened year that saw Tony Gwynn's quest for .400 stop short at .394. Had the strike not stopped play, Gould could enjoy quite possibly see a .400 hitter the year before. He must own a short memory. With tiny ballparks, watered down expansion era pitching, and a whole stable of strength and conditioning coaches within every clubhouse, I'd be surprised if we DIDN'T see a .400 hitter in the somewhat fundamental future.
No he's an idiot.. Tony Gywnn be only a few hits away.. so be George Brett.
I think it could arise. And never is a long time.
Tony Gwynn did it in 162 games (mid-season to the subsequent midseason).
No, the last .400 hitter be in 1941. Since consequently, there are factor that make it harder to hit:
1. More hours of darkness baseball- ball is easier to see within daylight.
2. Use of more pitchers during a game- batter would generally to some extent hit against the same pitcher 4 times within a game, but that doesn't develop much anymore.
3. In the '40s, there be a few elite players who focused on the team game completely and devoted all of their activitiies to improving. Ted Williams was such a hitter. Nowadays, as much as fan like to reflect on players are in it for the money and not love of the hobby, money IS a motivating factor. To get the money, within are many, heaps players with disciplined training regiments- especially pitchers. Therefore, the restricted hitter today does not have the profit he had a partially century ago.
When I want to know more about baseball statistical probabilities, the first individual I would ask would be a paleontologist.
It'll happen. There enjoy been several players to come close over the closing couple decades - George Brett's .390 in 1980 and Tony Gwynn's .394 surrounded by the shortened 1994 season being the closest. It may not surface for a while, but it will eventually happen.
For every hitter in attendance is a pitcher that has his number. That could be around 16 games and around 64 at bat. Thats enough to bring that bat average down below .400.
So far. He will be wrong because there will be another .400 hitter.
I cogitate hes right. With the way relievers are used, especially next to the left and right hand specialist, I don't think anybody's gonna hit .400 again. It be a different type of game from the pitching standpoint when guys resembling Williams did it.
I don't know if the fact he be a palenotologist gives him any credibility, but I will right to be heard this- the way pitching have become in this era, near relief pitchers, intentional walk, and the like, it will be enormously difficult. Ted Williams did not see three or four different pcithers in a team game he made four or five plate appearances.
One never knows! I other thought Ichiro of the Seattle Mariners would do it. Maybe he still will!
Is it true that surrounded by 1947 returning wwii vet be honored by allowing a few to play pro baseball for 1 season?
Question:I heard this rumor that within 1947 returning wwii vets be honored by allowing some of them to play professional baseball for one season. This was suspose to be call "the 26th man" but I can not find any reference to it anywhere.
Answers:
First of adjectives the war terminated in 1945. And no, within was no such agreement made to returning vet.
Well, Yankee dude beat me to it. The War finished in 1945 and your answer is no.
No.
I'm not sure if you are chitchat about impulsive veterans, or vets who have been within the pros before the time of war.
As a general rule, underneath federal law players who have been within professional baseball before the period of war and who then served surrounded by the military had the right to return to their baseball job after their military service was over (i.e., they couldn't be "fired" while they be in the military.) Surely, within were some who could no longer complete and didn't return. Many returned and played well for several years. Some returned but weren't able to modernize their skills. Cecil Travis - a wonderful shortstop for the Washington Senators - was never like after the war due to frostbite on his toes he suffered during the time of war, and his career be cut short. He most likely would enjoy made the Hall of Fame if not for the time of war. Hank Greenberg lost 4 1/2 years to the war and singular played a couple of seasons after his return. People resembling Ted Williams, Joe Dimaggio and Bob Feller missed 3-4 years during the war and come back and played great globe for a number of years afterwards. In certainty, Ted Williams lost two more years due to the Korean War, and if you look at his numbers and project out what he would have have if he hadn't lost 5 1/2 years to militiary service, his numbers would be staggering.
pretty sure the answer to this one is no
If you made the time
Radio stations that broadcast Minnesota Twins games?
Answers:
1500 kstp am radio station. The Twins are great!
I think I anwered this one yesterday as resourcefully.
THere is just so much information on MLB's website. There's a join from the site below. In fact, every squad has a page basically like this one, and there's a similar intertwine for every one of them.
In Softball slang...?
Question:I understand that the contraction WP= wild pitches, however when it is up to that time the pitcher's name within an article in the tabloid, for example, what does WP-Hayes mean?
Answers:
unbeaten pitcher
yep, Winning Pitcher. LP=Loosing Pitcher
Resolved Questions