Boxing Questions and Answers
Does anyone know not easy mike tyson punched contained by psi?.?
Question:Dose anyone know how hard tyson punched surrounded by psi . Foreman and Shavers hit at 1600psi as far as i know . Was tysons power ever measured . Surely it must of being?.
Answers:
I've hear that Mike Tyson hit at 1800psi and Nikolay Valuev hits at 2400psi
Close examination of Tyson’s punches have shown that just one punch have the potential to knock out and hospitalize the average man. In fact the force of Tyson’s knock out punch have an 85% chance of giving his opposition severe brain damage and is slickly great enough to fracture any bone surrounded by the average human skull. In his research Dr Pain compares this to the average man, who has a 2% unsystematic of inflicting this kind of injury - no wonder race fear the force of Iron Mike’s fist.
I enjoy heard masses measurements ranging from 1200 to 834 to 600 but let look at it from a science standpoint.
Surface Area of a boxing glove is what? Anyone wanna guess? I'll take a stab and right to be heard somewhere around 14 square inches.
300=Force/14
300*14 gives us a force of 4200 pounds
Force, surrounded by this case 4200, is equal to mass times acceleration.
4200=M*A.
F=M*A is within the units Newtons = Kilograms * Meters/Second^2
1 pound equals roughly 4.5 newtons
4200*4.5=18900
18900=M*A
I don't really know how fast Mike Tyson's punches accelerated, nor do I know how much mass be being accelerate at that rate. However a good puncher is competent to put more weight at the rear their punch, but obviously it won't be too much of their weightiness so I'm gonna guess and say he can find 1/4 of his mass moving towards his opponent, and at his prime he fought at in the region of 220. That means 55 pounds, 1 Kilogram=2.2 pounds. That technique 25 kilograms.
18900=25*A
18900/25=756
And we find that according to me Mike Tyson's punches accelerated at 756 meters per second squared. That sounds crazy but linger. Actually it sounds very crazy. That's accelerate at like 2 miles per second. But thats if he is accelerate his mass for one whole second. I once again am gonna guess and vote he takes something like 1/12th of a second to punch. So divide that 756 by 12 and we get a velocity of 63 meters per second. Sounds much more judicious. Now I have manage to prove nothing more later that I have waaay too much free time on my hand. Oh well. Hope that help put into perspective how realistic/unrealistic what you heard be. Anyone else got input or feedback make happen Tyson is my favorite and I'd love to find out if anyone knows what his punching power certainly was, if it be even ever tested.
P.S. I've used my physics "expertise", if anyone here has computer expertise and a directory containing Mike Tyson punching, perhaps we can find out more accurately, as challenging my guessing at everything that was unknown, and guessing one at a time leaves adjectives the minor faults to join up and make the concluding value pretty possibly fairly incorrect.
Not as many as Ivan Drago. He holds the world story. Everything he hit, he destroyed.
i dont know ask Robin Givens. Im sure shes an expert on how hard Tyson can punch.
yes
Strong satisfactory to beat up oodles bums in his trade. Not good satisfactory to beat Lewis, Holyfield and other few honourable fighters he has fought.
Is Roberto Duran the greatest Latin competitor of adjectives time?
Question:If not, who is?
Answers:
Tito Trinidad? Gaviota, what are you smoking? He's not even the best Puerto Rican boxer ever. I'd rank Wilfredo Gomez and Carlos Ortiz ahead of him. I'd put Wilfred Benitez ahead of him too.
With that said, I suggest Roberto Duran is the greatest Latin fighter ever. I love Julio Cesar Chavez, Salvador Sanchez, Ruben Olivares, Alexis Arguello, Carlos Monzon and so on. Chavez is almost certainly the most famous Mexican boxer ever but Sanchez would've be even more legendary have he not died so tragically at age 23.
Roberto Duran's greatness lies in the reality that he was beloved from the United States adjectives the way down to Peru. While Chavez and Sanchez be greatly respected and admired, it was mostly concentrated within the U.S. and in Mexico. As to where on earth Duran's appeal expanded a bit more. For this reason and this foundation only, I'd hold to rank Duran ahead of Chavez and Sanchez. Coming from a Mexican approaching me, I know that this is blasphemous.
probably not THE greatest but most definately ONE of the greatest
Hello, no he is good but the best gunfighter is "Tito Trinidad" from Puerto Rico" you can bet on it.
There have be many great Latin fighters surrounded by boxing history but I have to voice that Roberto Duran who won lightweight, welterweight, and middleweight titles is the best with respect to Cesar Chavez, Salvadore Sanchez, Alex Arguello and Ricardo Lopez and too various others to name.
Damn right he is. Only man to belt Sugar Ray Leonard in his prime. And going up two counterbalance divisions to do it.
Duran without a doubt. Never ducked anyone and fluff up great fighters.
I'd say Monzon be greater, probably salvador sanchez too.
YES
Duran is a great boxer but you got to also look at his competition his single true competition was Leonard and equal goes to Leonard. If you own to say who are the greatest you could next to Julio Cesar Chavez or Salvador Sanchez"He died in an auto fluke but he was proclaimed as the greatest boxer that never be," or you could go near Trinidad who has a bit of an asterisk on his story. De La Hoya is definitely not contained by the category of greatest boxers he has other Been over rated. Simply put I utter Chavez followed by Duran and Sanchez
10 or 15 years ago thismight have be easier to judge, but in that are so many perfect latin fighters to choose from now. i regard as i'm gonna go near Luis Firpo though. in his encounter with dempsey for the heavyweight title he get knocked down 10 times which money he got up 9 times. against dempsey thats amazing. he knock dempsey down twice in the first round. the second time the ref counted 9 but some of the writers outside the ring thought it be more like 14 second, so you could argue that firpo really won and should have be the first hispanic heavyweight champion and first non-white title holder since jack johnson.
NO...the greatest latin boxer was Carlos Monzon..
Is Mike Tyson contained by the top three of Boxing's greatest fighters?
Question:Please try to exclude any of his legal matter and crazy outburst out of the ring.
Answers:
Tyson couldnt even spell Muhammad Ali.
But seriously.he was a devastating puncher and thats something like it. If Cus D'amato lived he might very economically have be. In Tyson's early fight you saw a boxer with devastating power. After Cus died he respected not a soul enough who would detail him to work off of a double thrust to get inside because of his short stature. He become a head hunter who didnt throw combinations. he go for one big blow and most of the guys he fought were intimidated plenty to bow down to his reputation. He won most of his fights contained by the prefight staredown. Once Buster Douglas took away the invincibility factor, it was basically a matter of time since his career go in the toilet. He didnt own the good sense to be in motion back to the requisites. Once again Cus D'amato would have have his respect enough to transmit him this and he would have listen. He became even worse after the Micheal Spinks fracas because the only tie he have left to Cus be fired by Don King(Kevin Rooney). Tyson is not top 3. Tyson is not top 10. Tyson lies between 15-25 because He had 5 obedient years and then he become a laughing stock
Super Heavyweight - yes
all counterweight classes - no
uh .no
Ali
Jones Jr.
Sugar Ray Robinson
Ray leonard
not really - he was just dominant at a time when there no other really great fighters.
no, he bite's people's body parts rotten like he's ingestion Tyson chicken, who knows how plentiful time's he won becasue he did stuff like that that go unnoticed.
Not even in the top 10. Longevity is segment of what makes a combatant greater. Tyson's early occupation was probably as fascinating as any fighter contained by history, but after Buster Douglas knocked him out, he have never been starry again.
I don't know if he is the greatest but he is my favorite.
Depends on what prison you visit
When he first become champ he was probably one of the best ever..Not sure Ali could of slaughter him.. But Robin Givens made him crazy and he lost everything including his boxing skill
No, I'm counting his in the ring accomplishments. You can't compare him to Ali, Foreman, or other great ones.
Not even close. I would put him down around 40 or so...
He have to be... The funny thing is he have been my favorite boxer of this equals and he is my all time second favorite losing muhammad Ali. He was the youngest shortest and most problematic world heavyweight participant and had the most powerful punches and astonishing fight. He also holds the record i have an idea that for the fastest knockout and fight. So he is a foyer of famer when it comes to boxing.
Hardly, He`s a Bum
Not in the top 3 surrounded by my book. Though very fitting and still one of the best. There are still a few more fighters which I feel are better. Though we will never really know. Of course in attendance is Ali. Others: Marciano and don't just stick near the Heavyweights, Ray Leonard was great too.
I'd utter no. Check out www.thering-online.com -- its the Time magazine of boxing. Very reputable opinions and rankings.
No...
He is retired from June 11 2005...
Not rank anymore...
No, he had great power, but be not a highly skilled opponent.
That being said, if Cuss have not died, he may have gone down as one of the best ever.
If he have been rain properly he would not hoave lost to buster Douglas and would have probably overwhelmed Holyfield at that stage of his career!
Instead he will shift down as a famous enemy for being brutal in the ring and unconsidered out of it!
I think he does own a top 3 boxing video game!
as far as i'm concern...he have the best most divistating knock out punch in adjectives of boxing ever...he should be...but because of his legal battle and ear biting...peolpe will forget about how angelic of a boxer he was...not me though...
dguyto1, NO, and that is to say an emphatic NO, he doesn't even belong in the top ten.
He does not hold a candle to:
Archie Moore
Floyd Patterson
Carlos Palomino
Roy Jones Jr.
Rocky Marciano
Sugar Ray Robinson
Michael Carbajal
Floyd Merriweather
Evander Hollyfield
and the greatest of them adjectives: Muhammed Ali
Send Mike Tyson to the bad fighters home, he relied solely on aggression not style and as you would expect biting ability.
If you look put a bet on at his career, he never really whitewash anyone who was considered challenge caliber at the time. He lost all of the really earth-shattering fights he fought.
not a karma
maybe top 15
if he be lucky.
i will say this. he have more potential than almost any other fighter, ever.and he COULD enjoy been the greatest. i have an idea that thats realy mike tyson...
Not even close. As a heavyweight, he might be in the top 20.
Tyson lost to Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield twice, Lennox Lewis and a couple of nondescript heavyweights next so no I can't rank him surrounded by the top 3 or top 5. My top 5 are 1. Rocky Marciano 2, Joe Louis 3. Gene Tunney 4. Jack Dempsey 5. Muhammad Ali This is based on implementation in the ring simply.
No, Jack Johnson, Joe Louis and Muhammed Ali.
Hell no!!
He could of been but he blew it. He's definetly one of "THEE" most powerful guys to ever achieve in the ring, but not surrounded by the top 3. Shame though. Don King ruined him .. and made millions in the process.
No Way! I can estimate of 10-12 heavyweights that would have defeated him easily..Even Evander overthrow him twice and he was really a true pallid heavywight.Tyson was a brawler that be in in that at a time when there wasn't any apt fighters.he was greatly lucky in that respect.
Heck nah
Can i ask who won within Manny Pacquaio and Jorge Solis boxing event contained by april 14,2007?
Answers:
Manny Pacquiao upped his already outstanding record to 44-3-2(35) beside an eighth round knockout, while Solis dropped his padded story to 32-1(23). I think Pacquiao should very soon step up again and knock out Juan Manuel Marquez. I really can't wait to prove adjectives the people wrong roughly speaking Manny. Some say Marquez will win, but I vote otherwise. Manny is much stronger and much faster than Marquez.
Who cares boxing sucks!
manny 8th round knockout!! Yeah!!
manny pacquaio won
manny pacquiao by 2 knockout surrounded by 7th round and finally referee stopped within the 8th round
Pacquio won by knockout in the 8th round
Manny Pacquiao won the combat against Jorge Solis...
Knockout twice then the arbiter stopped the fight surrounded by the 8th round...
manny pacquiao won...(a) 8th round.......
MANNY
Resolved Questions