Cricket Questions and Answers
What's your liking pancake topping?
Answers:
maple syrup and vanilla ice cream
Real butter and syrup.
honey
wrong category
Who is responsible from the squad for losing against bangladesh?
Answers:
we're.
yes we expect more from india and we thought bangladesh is minnows, but they aren't
they've already beat alien zealanders. remember that.
also indian batting is flop against ability bowling and fielding. also indian bowling and field is pretty ordinary.
All of 'em
i suggest, its not the fault of any individual, though you may find someone contributing more than others, but the result of a team game is the result of the team-effort. so, i don't like the opinion to blame any individual. others' opinion may differ...
The guilty Person other asks..Gees.Way to go !
batsman
the Indian selectors, and the Indian public
Pleasw prop up OR pick holes surrounded by the following alternative suggestions to the current baffling run rate sytem?
Question:i think any system to be exact so complex you are waiting for the mathematicians to reveal who has finished where on earth, after the final round of games..doesnt allow the spectators and followers of the tournament to participate fully surrounded by the excitement as the finale approaches
what are the merits of the these scenarios.
1. the successful team earn a run ratio of the runs they scored divided by the wickets they lost
ie: 300 for 3 earn a ratio of 100 losers score nothing
250 for 5 earns a ratio of 50 losers win zero
360 for 6 earn a ratio of 60 losers score nothing
if the same squad had won adjectives three above matches their run ratio would be 70 [ie 100 +50+60= 210 divided by 3]
------------------------------...
alternatively, if a worth could be determined& assigned for one wicket..in language of its value when set against runs..after the winning troop could get two points for a win
+ an more score base on the..
Answers:
I can see one main problem near your calculation, and specifically that you don't take into depiction the type of pitch being played on. In cricket, here are clear occasions when a wicket would benefit the batsmen and others when it would favour the bowlers.
If I apprehend your system correctly, then a squad who plays most of their matches on bowling wickets will be at a serious disadvantage. Sometimes, the condition of the wicket make it very difficult for a troop to post a large total (e.g., during the South Africa vs. New Zealand contest, the wicket clearly favoured the bowlers, which is why the run rate for both sides be barely at 4 rpo.)
Although the Net Run Rate addition can be confusing, it is at least just. A team's NRR shows how quickly a troop scores runs surrounded by comparison to their opponents. Therefore it doesn't thing whether or not a wicket favours the batter or the bowler, as it will act within a similar way for both sides (although the condition of the pitch will distinctly deteriorate over the course of a match.)
I would suggest simply trusting the statisticians who subtract these things. They should know before a game starts what margin of feat is needed to get a undisputed NRR. I know it's not pretty, but it works!
And that is easier to work out than the current system?
It's rather easy. Number of runs score divided by number of overs batted (or 50 if bowled out) minus runs conceded divided by number of overs bowled (or 50 if they bowl a side out). It individual comes in to play ifteams are tied on points at the back of the group anyway.
Your system dosnt allow credit for tems chasing down small totals, duckwort/lewis matches, etc. If a troop bowls an opposition out for 50 and pass it for no wicket, they don't get as much credit as a squad that chases a higher sore or bat first.
I do not find any flaw in the present system of calculating the Net Run Rate and hance do not envisage any modification required.
I think your suggestion roughly speaking a margin of feat is a good one, as I own to admit I do catch slightly baffled by the current Net Run Rate calculations, especially as I am not much of a statistician, and the current system caculates NRR against adjectives the teams respectively team plays against - too complicated!
With your border of victory arithmetic, teams are rewarded for keeping wickets within hand, and correspondingly, teams who lose wickets are as expected penalised. The current system merely rewards against the relative speed of scoring runs.
Anyway, I think at hand should be 4 quarter-finals, 2 semis and a grand finale, not this Super Eight hooey.
Which is better for you, oatabix or weetabix?
Answers:
weetabix
oatabix
WEETBIX! lol
Weetabix is better for health than oatabix.
stop asking, food and drink request for information, this is sports category section
weetabix babe-in-arms
Weetabix. I had Oatabix and thought, "nope, if it ain't broke...surely Weetabix is better".
wat the hell is oatabix! Porridge..
WEETBIX(thats is how you spell it.)
Resolved Questions