Cricket Questions and Answers
Do you cogitate the World cup have be going for too long?
Question:I think they should hold the group stages, the top two qualifying for the Quarter Finals, the winner qualifying fhe semi finals and after the final.
Answers:
Yes because of GREED by the ICC. They're just interested surrounded by the money from television rights.
7 weeks? come on inhabitants, not even the soccer world cup goes on this long. I know they programmed every match to own a reserve day but thats unnecessary. Why couldn't we own 2 super 8 matches on in the future? why...greeed!
yep it has
but when you consider a meeting goes for 6/7hours
it kinda make sense
but i spose they couldve played more than one match a light of day
The 2003 system of matches be much better.
Most down to top soil cricket troop is....?
Question:I think its Sri Lanka and New Zealand
Answers:
For me.it is..The Black Caps Team.
New Zealand is the most down to soil team as far as I'm concerned. They (their bowlers) don't stare approaching killing the batsmen and don't shout, bawl at everything.
When a wicket has fall they don't make any gesture towards the dismissed batsmen. All they do is gel together and enjoy among themselves and to be precise wat makes them a formidable troop which is most down to earth.
alien zealand and australia
South Africa and West Indies..
My choice is same as yours.
I don't think any "team" can be classed as down to loam -
Many of the players of all team are approachable, happy to chat beside fans and sign autographs. Other players from a range of teams appear to treat this as a chore.
has to be New Zealand, thier players aren't up themselves approaching Aust, Eng and some of the other teams.
At present none of the team are worthy of this honour. A year back we could enjoy told New Zealand as the best answer but it doesn't seems so very soon. There have be many unsportive attitude from the kiwis. There are closely of players who have shown pious sportsmanship spirits but indiviually collectively no team at the moment is down to top soil
new zeland
as expected it is INDIA
they r down and out
they r dumped to the ground!!
new zeland
i infer it has to be contemporary zealand bcoz they r best in d world
New Zealand
Bangladesh
Australia!
I believe it's New Zealand and South Africa.
new zealand
It's New Zealand. We don't hear any problems inwardly their players, conflicts, debates among their assorted officials. They a moment ago play their game positively, confidentely & to their potential.
It have to be Sri Lanka for sure..
Read this out>> http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/07/...
Is it still a hatrick?
Question:My question is if ,within Cricket,you get 2 wickets within 2 balls and later after that you ball a no-ball and afterwards you get a wicket near the ball after the no-ball.Will it still be a Hat-rick
Answers:
Definitely not. A no-ball is not counted as a orb bowled but this only act as a penalty against the bowler for bowling the no-ball within the first place. Any bowler that celebrated a "hat-trick" in this scenario would without question be laughed at! An interesting scenario would be if the batsmen be given out for "handling the ball" (as they can be) on the no-ball..is this then a hat-trick?
No
no because the bowler bowled a non legal ball (The no-ball)!
no. it is not counted because he have bowled a delivery to the batsman and surrounded by cricket a hatrick happens when a bowler take three wickets in succession
no
NO it is not a hattrick
yes
No,it is not
A no-ball is an iffy delivery,a bowlers mistake
It might be hit for a six as all right
A hat trick manner 3 wickets off 3 consecutive delivery
Run-outs not counted All 3 wickets should be credited
to the bowler's name similar to caught ,stump out,bowled,lbw,hit wicket. .Even if the bowler himself does the run-out,
it will not be counted for his hat trick
So,it will not be a helmet trick even if the ball without delay after
the no-ball fetches a wicket.
Batsman can be out run out, handle the ball, hit the globe twice, or obstructing the area on a no globe
Run outs are not considered for hat tricks
substantial:
Handled the ball, hit the orb twice, or obstructing the corral.
will be not considered a part of the hood trick as the
wickets are not credited to the bowler's name surrounded by these cases
Best Regards,
no
What is peak individual total score by an Indian batsman surrounded by exam cricket? Name the batsman? In which year?
Answers:
Highest Individual Score: 309
Batsman: Virender Sehwag
Year: 1st test meeting of the series 2003/04
Venue: Multan
Opponent Country: Pakistan
sachein tendulkar in2003
309 by Virender Sehwag against Pakistan at Multan in i feel 2004 or 2005. www.cricinfo.com to check that.
SEHWAG SCORED 309 AGAINST PAKISTAN IN THE 2003-04 SERIES IN MULTAN IN PAKISTAN
Highest individual total score contained by a Test Match by an Indian was 344 runs score by Mr. S.M. Gavaskar (124 runs in first innings and 220 runs surrounded by the second innings) in the 5th Test of 1970/71 series played against West Indies at Quuen's Park Oval, Port of Spain, Trinidad from 13th to 19th April, 1971.
Highest individual ranking in an innings by an Indian be the 309 runs scored by Mr. Virender Sehwag surrounded by the 1st innings of the first test of 2003/2004 series played against Pakistan at Multan Cricket Stadium from 28th March to 1st April 2004.
310,Virendar Sehwag,2003
309,V.Shewag,2006
309 BY VIRENDER SEHWAG AGAINST PAKISTAN
v sehwag contained by 2003
309 runs
SUNNY 344 1970
Resolved Questions