Cricket Questions and Answers
Who be the better batsman for England - Paul Collingwood or Kevin Pietersen?
Question:Do not take into consideration previous performances, previous statistics or idolization. Even though KP score 70 runs more than Colly during the World Cup, i just would resembling your opinion as to which of them you thought perform better?
Answers:
Pieterson is excellent but him coming good next to the bat is unpredictable.when you think he is gonna procure a good evaluation ,he gets out cheaply .approaching in the hobby against south africa.Collingwood has be more consistent and can handle pressure better than Pieterson.
So i influence Collingwood.no isay Pieterson. no Collingwood.
baaah! who cares!
Its Colingwood Dear .
Kevin pietersen is the best batsman for England.
Paul Collingwood. He is more consistent.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net/score.asp...
paul collingwood,
though kp's not far trailing
Paul Collingwood is the most consistant & he can be Dependable
I consider Paul Collingwood as the best batsman as he is more consistent than Pietersen.
kevin peitersen
To be honest i was disappointed contained by them both but collie would be my choice
Kevin Pietersen
Paul Collinwood no arguement
I'd have to walk with Collingwood
paul collingwood - for his stable conduct
kevin pietersen - striking ability
I would hold to say KP as he is the more consistant player.
K.P. bat well for South Africa the other daylight. He is a great player but very normally gives his wicket away. Collingwood other makes the bowler earn his wicket.
Collingwood is the better player technically within my opinion. Pieterson is a slogger who will any get loads of runs or none at adjectives. If I had to trademark a bet on who would score more runs my money would be on PC, he is more consistant because of his better temperament.
I infer Paul Collingwood is a better batsman... he has better technique than Kevin Pieterson...
to be honest i would enjoy to say collingwood , i know KP is the best soon batsman but collingwood is more of an all rounder, he did severely well un pressure lower down the decree
paul colling wood who irritates the bowlers standing in the crease for long time
I'm so sorry for you. You made it immaculately clear that you wanted previous recitation excluded, and wanted an assessment of the two in this world cup. Most a short time ago ignored that. During this world cup KP be better, he scored more runs. If we and the selectors start rating batsmen by how few runs they chalk up, then it will be even worse later it is now, if that's possible
Paul Collingwood is the more consistent and hence the better.
collingwood have been a bit more consistent
Kevin Pietersen
Kevin Pietersen
my dear frnd kevin peterson is a better batsmen next paul coolingwood but cooling wood is more consistent then him for more information contact http://crickinfo.com
enjoy a nice day!!!!
Silly,Kevin Peterson is the best batsman surrounded by the world.Then obviously he will be the best for Engalnd.
pieterson
collingwood
BOTH.
KP is the better batter. All the stats spinal column this up.
Who is the first batsman who made a century?
Answers:
The first batsman to make century within test cricket be
Charles Bannerman of Australia.
He scored 165 runs beside the help of 18 fours against England surrounded by the first Test Match played at Melbourne Cricket Ground from 15th to 19th March, 1877. Australia won that match by 45 runs.
He be also the first batsman to face the first transference bowled in the assessment cricket. The first delivery within test cricket be bowled by
Alfred Shaw of England.
Please check the following link for the gain card of that match:
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/archive/1870s...
Bomken Basar
Mohammed Azharruddin is the solitary player in the history of Test cricket to mark a century in respectively of his first three test match.
The first Test Match was played at the Melbourne Cricket Ground between England and Australia from 15th –19th March 1877.
The 6 ball over were first introduced surrounded by 1900
and i dont know the answer.
My great grand father grand father fathers wifes brothers sons wifes brother.
Mr abracadabra!
run to England ask there.they are first introduced cricket. so they certain it.!
I odi Or tests.
bradman
The 1877 meeting was a timeless Test played from 15 March to 19 The first ever testing was Aust v Eng within March 1877, with a rest sunshine on 18 March, with 4-ball overs. Australia score 245 in the first innings, near 165 from Charles Bannerman, the first Test century, before he retired hurt (over 67% of the total, a Test transcript that still stands). The England team, captain by James Lillywhite, scored 196 surrounded by reply, with Billy Midwinter taking 5/78, the first Test "five for". Australia score 104 in their second innings, beside Alfred Shaw taking 5/38, setting England a target of 153 to win, but England were bowled out for 108, next to Tom Kendall taking 7/55.
What I find amazing is that the centenary test 100 years latter in 1977 be also won by AUstralia by the exact same margin of 45 runs.
K. S. Ranjitsinghji, affectionately certain to the cricket world as Ranji was the first man to enjoy scored a century.
OBVIOUSLY NOT BY MYSELF
Nobody Knows.
Nobody know exactly in which year the spectator sport of cricket was started. Some unknown entity in some unknown rural community gali-mohalla might have made a century 200 or 300 years ago !
Mr Foolhardy !! When you asked this quiz, you should have mentioned surrounded by which type of cricket.. i.e. test cricket, one-day, first-class contest, or club-cricket or village cricket..
You get the answer you deserved. Right.
NOT ME!!!!
It is also my question??
surrounded by international odi's
K. S. Ranjitsinghji
made 1st 100
Is sachin tendulkar will shine within world cup?
Answers:
Why not! He will be one of our winning stroke player.
in need any doubts he will shine...seeing his past paperwork in world cup he will surely...this might be his end chance to bring the world cup for India..so he has to do it..he will do it..
why not... he will earn closely of bucks... on-field & off the area.. but what about us???
as expected
yes
Yes, he will shine in the world cup.
ya,for sure he will.purely hoping his good strength so tht he can sine in world cup.
Why not! He will be one of our triumphant stroke player.
without any doubts he will shine...seeing his ancient records within world cup he will surely...this might be his last opening to get the world cup for India..so he have to do it..he will do it..
yes
of course.why not?
60 % to 40%
He should !!
World Cup is every Cricketers dream
I cogitate he will give his best contained by the world cup as he has done surrounded by the past
His presence contained by the team itself give a shine to the team. With his experience he will win runs and take wickets when needed and accomplishment as a deputy and finally make the ill will worry roughly speaking his stay in the pen.
excuse me, u kno abt whom u r asking? u r asking abt god of cricket, sachin will surely shine in the WC- hey come on jus 18 days, let keep our fingscrossed n pray for india, let us all b 1. come on
jeetega toh sirf INDIA
will sachin shine contained by wc 07 ? of course
He other play's well contained by the world cup.
Since he is gradually coming to form as have been witnessed contained by the recent matches, he will defenitely shine for India within the World Cup.
Definately b'coz he is only BEST Player of every WC he Played.
yes
40%Yes 60% No
yes he will be honest to watch
20-20 challenge will be more fun dan this Cricket world cup 2007..more below?
Question:ICC Twenty20 World Championship 2007 Fixtures
September 2007
DateHomeAwayVenueStart
11South AfricavWest Indies20/20Wanderers Stadium18:00
12New ZealandvKenya20/20Kingsmead10:...
12PakistanvScotland20/20Kingsm...
12AustraliavZimbabwe20/20Newla...
13West IndiesvBangladesh20/20Wanderer... Stadium10:00
13ZimbabwevEngland20/20Newland...
13IndiavScotland20/20Kingsmead...
14AustraliavEngland20/20Newlan...
14IndiavPakistan20/20Kingsmead...
14Sri LankavKenya20/20Wanderers Stadium19:00
15Sri LankavNew Zealand20/20Wanderers Stadium14:00
15South AfricavBangladesh20/20Newlands...
16C1vD220/20Wanderers Stadium10:00
16B1vA220/20Newlands14:00
16A1vB220/20Newlands18:00
17D1vC220/20Wanderers Stadium18:00
18C1vB220/20Kingsmead10:00
18B1vD120/20Wanderers Stadium14:00
18A2vC220/20Wanderers Stadium18:00
19A1vC120/20Kingsmead14:00
19B2vD220/20Kingsmead18:00
2
Answers:
for me its just mickey mouse cricket that have been invented to attract the non believers,yeah its pious to see the big hits but what else does 20/20 cricket have? and what credibility does the beater get-i mean who care who wins a 20/20 title fight. sorry mate I'm a bit more on the traditional side.
20/20 is no world cup, no matter how fruitless this one has be organised by the icc,lets hope the finals are great and our end memories of this world cup are good ones
i know the fixtures . But yea it probably will coz Twenty-20 is adjectives about big hits n adjectives. We will b treated to fantastic batting. the bowlers will supply it their best too.
It would be a cracker. World Cup 2007 is dragging and boring. Hope atleast semis are interesting.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net/score.asp...
yes the 20-20 world cup will be more fun than the odi world cup with India and Pakistan within the same group.
thank you for sharing the fixtures beside the sports-faq.com team.
I imagine 20/20 will be more exciting as there will it will be more entertaining and performance packed as compared to ODI.
I meditate 20-20 will replace ODI (50 overs) some day.
20-20 = more interesting, more hitting (6's) etc.
ODI (50) = slow activity, bored fans etc.
Too much of cricket will product players and fans tired.
ICC should muse more about players a bit than scheduling useless tournaments.
I don't think the test-playing nation will field their top players for this tournament (unless they want to own a fun time out there) - but the tournament should be very exciting, surrounded by my opinion.
Resolved Questions