Football American Questions and Answers
Which sport is better basketball or americn football?
Answers:
Football is by far better. Basketball has become nil but a bunch of over-payed street thugs and gangsters.it is no longer a squad sport. I stopped watching it after Artest and others attacked fans. Never again will I survey basketball, but I live for football season.
soccer
Football by far.
Football, by a lot.
NON The best and merely good sport surrounded by the world is SOCCER, and thats it.
football
football
footaball is alot better because there are enthusiast bases everywhere. family in europe close to american football because it is AMERICAN and it is just so much cooler that basketball. Unlike basketball that they already hold
bouncey bouncey bouncey basketball is sooooo boring footbal by far is better to watch on tv but surrounded by person basketball still sucks
NASCAR Akbar !
I'm kinda partial to American football...both college and pro!
Soccer.
American "football" is lately a watered down version of Rugby or Aussie Rules.
FOOTBOL!!
i close to to play basketball but i like to keep under surveillance football
american football...NFL is the greatest
FOOTBALL!
It's realy close. alot of people similar to basketball but more like (A) football.i reckon football is better but basketball isn't bad anyway thats my belief.
American football
Definately football..I'm obsessed near the NFL and college football...I love when football season rolls around its soo fun!
Well, since you posted this question within the Football (American) category, you're gonna get more answers preference toward football, as you should. Football is more of a team sport, import it takes adjectives 11 guys on the field doing their opportunity to score a TD or shutdown an offense. In basketball, it seem every team have that one guy that tries to take the winter sport over by himself, even though he's got 4 teammates to surpass to.
american football rocks basketball hardcore. that's a definite american football. i propose what's not to love, but if you asked this same question within basketball then they would report to you the opposite. but i own a non-biased vote here. college football vs. college basketball. this goes to football. pro basketball vs. pro football. this is a huge blowout win by american football.
FOOTBALL BABY ALL THE WAY WHO LIKES WATCHING A BUNCH OF GUYS SQUEAKING THERE SHOES ON A HARD WOOD FLOOR WHEN YOU CAN WATCH A BUNCH OF GUYS KNOCKING EACH OTHER TO A GRASSY FLOOR.
football
Mama said fuzball is for the devil. But I say aloud fuzball anyway.
If you're an American, then you'd pick football. Football is a giant powered game, and TD's don't come as recurrently as a basketlball goal, you hold to wait till the later two or three minutes to even get excited if the team are close. If a game of football is devout, you're always excited. NFL is different yes, you don't ranking as many times. But High School and College is other fun to watch. Anything can occur.
basketball is more exciting and faster pace..
WHy surrounded by the hell did the Texans surpass on Reggie Bush?
Answers:
Two words.. Crack Cocaine. They had to hold been on some serious drugs when that made that agreement. There had to hold been question as to Carr and Dominic Davis-Williams before the draft ultimate year. To pass on not singular Bush, but Young and Lienart is crazy. If they were going to do something silly similar to draft Mario Williams, they should have traded down and get additional picks. They probably could hold still got Mario, but picked up an secondary second and third round pick in the process.
I contemplate they thought he was related to "the relatives."
OR DID REGGIE PASS ON TEXAS
because they believed in the combine BS, and didn't draft the best player availible they should've get Bush or Young, but they just followed the Cleveland Browns Draft playbook, regard as about it the browns passed up on Donovan Mcnabb and LT surrounded by different drafts instead we got tim couch and gerrard warren, and also drafted courtney brown instead of urlacher within 00'/ GO RAVENS!
Dont have the money and didnt construe they needed him.
because casserly wants to screw the texans. become aware of how hes not with the troop anymore. but in adjectives seriousness. they figure the passageway to beat the colts is on defense, because they know they cant outscore them so they hold to beat them a different method and thus they went beside mario williams, the best defensive player surrounded by the draft at the time. plus they also had dominik williams at the time and they didnt know he would acquire suck and get hurt.
I'm not a Texan's Fan, but a NFL Draft Fan.
This is what I be told last year:
Instead of signing Bush, the Texans opt to work with a more signable player who they approved could be the cornerstone of their defense. DE Mario Williams comes into the league touted as the next Julius Peppers, beside some personnel around the league believing he could be even better.
People believed that Mario Williams would make an instantaneous impact for a team that rank second to last surrounded by total defense, registering only 37 sack in 2005.
Although Reggie Bush would hold given them a different dynamic to add to the offense, the Texans clearly needed more facilitate on the defensive side of the globe.
Finally, the Houston Texans truly believed that Williams puts them in a situation to be exceedingly competitive in the AFC South and for masses years to come, especially when you have Peyton Manning to preserve.
I hope this answers your question, or be it just you Ranting?
their justification was because they looked-for to build up their defense. they felt the best passageway they would beat the colts be to have a better defense. thats why they brought within mario williams.
Texans want to be the the next Lions. Houston Texans are still fairly a new squad, so they have tons years to go to really consider up to the stagnant doings of the Lions. But passing up on a talent resembling Reggie Bush was a great step contained by that direction.
What will they do in this draft to shut in up to the Lions?
Fortunately the draft isn't far off, so the skulk won't be too long.
Because there stupid, they do this every year.That's why the suck so much.
They made the right move. Give Williams a bit more time to pan out and you will see.
its a conspiracy
Texans looked-for defense over an offense playmaker that they obviously lack. The way it looks, the Texans coulda be good finishing year with Demeco Ryans on defense and Bush on offense... conceivably offensive and preventative rookies of the yr?
BUT worked out for Bush didnt it? I think it did. Go Texans hahaha!
Hmmmmm, I would ask why elapse on Vince Young..then permit Carr go and trade for another QB. Seems the Texans are newly plain stupid!
They thought that both he and Vince young would cost opening to much money and they still needed to get more players. It is unyielding to pass up bush but it be so they could build a better team
It beat the heck outta me!! Certainly this team needed a dynamic player close to Bush to bolster its offensive output and remove some of the pressure from David Carr's shoulders. I bet they are regretting that pick in a minute!
ill share u y ur texans passed on reggie. The texans thought " oh we have dominick davis, we dont inevitability a rb, our defense needs relieve. So lets draft the 1 guy who every 1 think is great but stinks" They are a bunch of idiotic dopes!
The Texans looked-for to improve their ratify rush. A dominating pass rusher can be in recent times as important to a squad as a start runningback. They felt that Mario Williams could vastly modernize their pass rush which would remodel their defense which ranked in close proximity last surrounded by the league. Mario Williams is still learning and will go and get better. It's only a situation of time before he have a 10+ sack season. Don't judge him after one season especially when he be facing double teams due to the reality that he was the number 1 pick within the draft.
As far as people complaining the Texans didn't draft Reggie Bush, to be exact getting old. Bush would not hold helped the offense that much. He didn't enjoy that many rushing yard and wasn't a very big factor contained by the running game. He worked more contained by the receiving team game but didn't do much that a slot receiver can't do. He have a good rookie season and I do ruminate he will eventually be a star in the NFL but he wasn't that amazing. Vince Young would enjoy been the best choice for the Texans. His amazing athleticism would own made up for the lack of offense dash in Houston.
I mull over they thought he would want too much money and they didn't want a contract holdout.
maybe they qualified he was picked already, stupid Texans too blind to see in that feature fund
Defense wins championship, except for a few exceptions. I agree the 49'ers won it with crude schemes and an underrate defense but for the most part defense win championships. They thought they would build the protecting side of the ball because they already have a good back(did they see him self hurt for the season? NO!)
Cuz he's not that awesome. I'm a Saints fan, so I can enunciate that. All Reggie is good at is drawing medium attention to himself.
The Texans passed on Reggie Bush because...
1) Gary Kubiak - His offensive system is not base on big star RB's specially not the type that Reggie Bush is (Bush is more of a Brian Westbrook type RB who gains most of his yard from receiving yardage instead of pounding the football.
2) Reggie Bush - Reggie needed 6 Million dollars more than Mario Williams over a 3-5 year span that is 2 - 1.2 Mil a year more that money could slickly be spent on FA's.
3) Dominik (Davis) Williams - The extent of his injuries was worse than it seem at the end of final season. So the team thought that playing a clothed RB and a 1st round DE was better than have 1 really good RB 1 wearing clothes RB and crap a DE.
Why did they pass on Vince Young. If they didn't want any of the two they should have traded the pick.
Your discussion about one and the same team that have needed to fill o-line spots since their inception but refuse to do so, instead subjecting their QB to 50 + sacks a year and largely tolerating losing football. Who knows why they do anything that they do.
the big sense i heard be because they needed help on defense, someone to stop Peyton Manning.
but one-sidedly, it's because they're idiots. let's wait to New Orleans vs. Houston and see what happen.
Who is worse NFL quarterback of adjectives time?
Question:It has to be Joey Harrington I aim the guy just can't win. Although I remember Rob Johnson for the Buffalo Bills be lousy. Then again Ryan Leaf was desperate too. This is tough but overall it has to be Joey Harrington.
Answers:
Leaf is a suitable one, but how about Akili Smith? Cade McNown. I know we're one shortsighted here, but I can't think hindmost that far.Good call on Dave Brown too.
ok what you said
Ryan Leaf is firm to beat within this category.I put my vote there.
Ryan Leaf
Worst of adjectives time! Tie between Doug Pedersen (Eagles/Green Bay) and Pat Ryan (Eagles/Jets)...close third, Gus Frerotte (Skins and others)
I was. Bet you never even hear of me, and I'm ashamed to tell you who I am.
I enjoy to say the quaterback for the 1976 bucaneers becuase if you dance 0-16 you must be the qorst quaterback ever
I gotta cast my vote for Heath Schuler. Redskins drafted him #3 overall, and he be so bad that they have a 7th round pick start in place of him, Gus Frerrotte.
The Giants have some pretty bad ones, approaching Joe Pisarcik and Dave Brown.
No man Cordell Stewart, that guy was trick. But I will have to agree near your Leaf comment
The Cleveland Browns select Tim Couch for their 1999 #1 draft choice. Need I say more?
Ryan Leaf is really complicated to beat contained by this category.
Ryan Leaf may not be the worst ever i am sure he is better then a 4th stringer who made the cut for one squad way spinal column when but if you are saying the worst starter or biggest bust it would own to be leaf...he be a coin flip at the draft from going #1 over payton manning (who did move about #1) but his 1 for 15 fot 4 yards and 2 ints and 3 fumbles against kansas ctiy might enjoy been the worst conduct ever by a starter
Eli Manning
Tie between McNabb or Ryan Leaf. McNabb is way too overrated. But it's too strong to get worse than Leaf.
Richard Todd, NY Jets
ryan branch,tim couch, akili smith,joey harrington, are a few more modern crap players.
Hard to choose just one. Here's my roll
Ryan Leaf - he couldnt complete a pass to the Pacific Ocean
Akili Smith - no work ethic, no talent, no casual
Cade McNown - set the Bears franchise back at least possible 3 years
Aaron Brooks - As a Saints fan, within were tons times that I wanted to pulsation the hell outta him. He'd be good one minute, after throw an INT the next, next laugh something like it. That bastard
David Klingler - What the hell were the Bengals thinking?
Jeff George - A strong arm paired next to a strong will and strong emotions is a bleak combination
Jim Drunkenmiller - not only did he suck, but he sucked on a troop that has produced arguably the best QB ever contained by Joe Montana
Andre Ware - the curse of the Heisman Trophy strikes again!
Todd Blackledge
RICK MIRER - ND to Seatlle........ Garbage!
JIM DRUNKENMILLEN - VT to Frisco....Just awful!
CHRIS WEINKE - FSU to Carolina......1-19 as starter
TIM COUCH - UK to Cleveland......Yea... he blew too!
TRENT DILFER - FRESNO to Tampa, Seattle, Baltimore .........
MARK RYPIEN ? - Washington.....See Trent Dilfer
Need any more!
WHO DAT? The 9er's didnt produce Joe, JOE MADE THE 9er's!
I am sure I am going to get crap for this comment, but I strongly be aware of that Michael Vick is a terrible quarterback. Many reason why. The Quarterback is a leader, and a moral decision designer among other things. You ready for some reason? Ok here.
Blame Ryan Leaf and Tim Couch and Akili Smith , but they did not have crude lines and the poor talent around them forced them to make impossible decisions. In the termination the teams fan ruined thier careers. Jon Kitna and Joey Harrington, both be put in like peas in a pod situations and didn't succeed, but changed early surrounded by thier career and turned that around. Now Michael Vick, the falcons built a squad, a line everything around him, to put together him good, but he lacks the skill to head a football team.
Michael Vick can't stay within the pocket plant his foot and launch that ball into a WR hand. He simply cannot do it. the only entity he is able to do is run around approaching a chicken find Alge Crumpler 10 yards out because he cant bring out any farther and throw it to him, or rush the ball.
I do not even consider Vick a quarterback. He is a running hindmost that cannot take a pounding, so he wants a line to cover up behind, and thats basically what Altanta gave him and he can't do anything next to it. DONT EVEN DARE BLAME THAT ATLANTA DEFENSE. They ahve been honourable for years. Its all Vick. Vick is the worst QB.
steve bono next to the cheifs
Doug Williams-even though he won a SB it was the just good activity he ever played. Even Harrington has have better games.
Tim Couch.
Leaf
arron brooks
Rex Grossmen
Ryan Leaf
What should my timed 40 be?
Question:If I am 18 and a 6'0'' 280lbs NT or DT who is going to try out for college ball, what 40 time should I be looking at? my later 40 was a 5.2 but that be like a year ago. That devout or bad or what? I am not looking to be surrounded by the NFL so i don't need answers relating me it should be a 4.4 or some crap like that. What is a dutiful 40 for a defensive lineman who basically wants to play college globe?
Answers:
Your 40 time is significant.
But as you noted...NOT THAT significant.
College coaches will be looking at your flexibility, agility, and strength as well.
I will report to you this though...
if you don't pull a hasty 40 time, or bench press your body weight, you may appendage up on the O-line.
those are the two qualifications for my D-line...
Break 5 surrounded by the 40 and bench body weight.
Good luck.
THE 40 IS OUTDATED.more approaching a 20 on any given play!
under 5 for sure.allll daylight!
to be a good college dt you should be shooting to run at most minuscule a 4.9 in the 40. youve get good size already, a short time ago focus on your strength and running a 4.9 and youll be good.
reading light speed, get to work...
5.2, That's pretty perfect for a 40. I think that's competitive for college. Of course you probably want to follow the current above-board speeds the pros are doing, right? I say 5.0 or smaller number will make you a popular DT or NT. However for that faddy position speed isn't really a factor as much as overall "mack truck strength is".
Good luck!!
I'll give you a extent that you should try to fall into. 4.75 to 5.25, but you really oughta not verbs too much as long as you actually stand out while you play. Production is what matter most on all level.
The amount of time it took you
at ur size, under 5 is showy... so ur not too bad, keepin pushin 4 d 5.0..surrounded by collage u shud b competative.....
Resolved Questions