Football American Questions and Answers
Why did the EAGLES sign Bethel Johson instead of a protective player resembling Cato June, besides the hat issue?
Answers:
I am English and i have no perception what the hell you are talking something like buddy
One of the main basis why the eagles signed Bethel Johnson was insurance that Donovan McNabb will hold a deep threat who can stretch the pasture in armour Donte Stallworth doesnt resign with them. (Stallworth is currently reviewing offer from other teams and comparing). And who know, they might still get Cato June subsequent but he is really holding off of signing near anyone right away to see if a better offer might come soon.
Because that be the only waterboy that be a free agent!
Cheaper
You answered your own question. It be primarily because they have no money. It be the cap issue.
because Andy Reid be on his month of leave and be smoking crack with his son and wasn't fascinated
i am a huge eagles fan and i thought of that too and i believe they will go after ctao june too but reciver be a bigger hole even though there linebackers arent anything huge but they could own this
gocong,trotter,gaither i would not mind that combo
I don't think they signed Bethel Johnson to be a starting wide open receiver, especially near only 39 work receptions, but instead to return kick, which was a vague spot for the Eagles last year. They place a big value on special team and they probably would like to restore their starting field position. They drafted Jeremy Bloom for this purpose but he hasn't pan out so far. They signed him because he can help them within an area of obligation and he doesn't hurt their cap space plenty to rule out future signings.
We'll see if they sign Kevin Curtis to be a starting wideout. He is a predictable choice: a smart guy, and a Mormon, so Andy may like his guise. They would probably like to draw from him but other teams could outbid them.
If they considered necessary Cato June, they could always fit him within under the hat by restructuring contracts, so it's probably not just that. I regard as they may still go after him, because after a couple of years the Eagles do listen to their critics, who enjoy been wise saying they need back at linebacker. It all depends what they devise of June. Also, I think he is boys beside Lito Sheppard, not that that matters that much but sometimes players help out bring other players in. The Eagles love to keep hold of things quiet and afterwards spring things on their fanbase, as they did with Jevon Kearse.
Yes, it is frustrating to examine players like Stallworth confer on and see all these superior profile free agents signings. But if you look around the league it seems approaching a lot of average players own been overpaid because of shaky free agent crop.
What exactly is a Buffalo Bill?
Question:In the NFL, what is a Buffalo Bill supposed to be?
Answers:
Buffalo Bill was a recognized old west Bufflao hunter and Indian participant. It's kind of a play on his soubriquet. Another theory is that Bills stands for:
Boy
I
Love
Losing
Superbowls
I LOVE THAT GRAPHIC!
Just forget about SABRES07 this what this forum is all almost. L personally don't know, but thank you for the interview.
The price you pay for chicken wing?
named after Buffalo Bill
This guy surrounded by link.
IT'S A BUFFALO!!!!
An old-fashioned Cowboy type guy Buffalo Bill Cody, went out and kill off the Buffalo so that the Native Americans wouldn't enjoy food. Yeah that is where on earth the name come from as well.
Does anyone else construe this might be true?
Question:As much as I agree with the reality that the Raiders could severly use a QB of great potential like JaMarcus Russell, does anyone else devise that maybe the Raiders should revolutionize its potent offensive splash first? The Raiders have an opportunity to do so by picking Joe Thomas. After adjectives, look at how much D'Brickashaw Ferguson helped out the New York Jets. Any opinion?
Answers:
I do agree that Joe Thomas may be the best pick for the Raiders.
However, the Raiders need too much give a hand for any one pick. They should trade down a couple of spots with Cleveland or Tampa Bay (to stockpile picks). If they are lucky, Joe Thomas will still be available at #3 or #4, and they should also nick the best offensive lineman available beside their 2nd round pick. While they do have closely of needs, abhorrent line is the best place to start building as it is needed to both surpass and run the ball.
(look at how the Jets started to turn their franchise around closing year with D'Brickshaw and Nick Mangold - boy, did Herman Edwards give up your job Eric Mangini a mess).
----Note: Has their ever been a super bowl troop that had a fruitless offensive smudge? No, but Baltimore won the super bowl with Trent Dilfer at QB and Tampa Bay won near Brad Johnson at QB.
- "Give me an offensive dash that can push the defense back 3 yard on every play, and I will run the ball for you." - me
They hold pros at the offensive file. Russel will help that squad and they need to win rid of moss and find a good reciever surrounded by the second round hopefully dwayne jarret.
Good idea but adjectives I can remember is when the Raiders did just that surrounded by drafting Robert Gallery. He was supposed to be a badass but is a second tier lineman. A QB similar to JaMarcus Russell only comes around once surrounded by about 10 years. Big tough filthy lineman come around on a yearly idea. You can't pass on the potential to hold a future assembly room of fame QB on your roster.
You own a good suggestion there, but if the Raiders do realize it wont event who they have throwing the orb because he wont be able to minus getting hit. I could just see them picking someone else, i.e. Calvin Johnson, because his attraction to their team would be more than Joe Thomas' would. If they did that, they would sign a free agent QB or trade a next pick for a NFL backup.
There are some very polite lineman to be picked up in the 2nd and 3rd or even subsequent rounds that can be developed. JaMarcus Russell has the potential to be a especially talented qb within the NFL and it would be a mistake to pass him up.
NO, what they stipulation is Russell and if they could (but they cant) get Calvin Johnson but they sericly obligation a WR in the sedond round to enjoy Russell have a arbitrariness to do anything, becuz without Moss the Raiders really, really, really suck
No I don't believe the Raiders will steal a chance on another O-lineman contained by the first round after Gallery burned them. And Russell has "potential" purely like Vick and look at Vick. I have an idea that the smarter choice here is to be is to pick up the guy who is going to be more consistant over the next five years. The guy who could come within and make an instant impact and that's Brady Quinn. I know his senior year wasn't the greatest but he's all set and he's willing. And yes Russell is also but he won't be in place to start until late contained by the year and that's only because Walter and/or Booty will rumple. I am a huge Raiders fan and I really don't resembling Quinn but he would be the more sensible choice.
The Radiers need to return with a Quarterback They can work on the Line with then draft picks and in free agents. they be just crap at quarterback concluding year which is how they got the # 1 pick
That would be honourable in proposal, but for the Raiders to do that, they would have to trade down. Joe Thomas can furnish immediate give support to, but the idea of the #1 pick is to bring the best athlete available. That would be Calvin Johnson, but, since Oakland's biggest need besides defense is QB, Russell is the smart pick. If they can net a good deal to trade down 4 or 5 spots, Thomas would be a ideal fit.
yes sir
weel they tried that a few years back, they drafted robert gallery #2 and passed on the oppurtunity to draft phillip rivers and trade for eli man, and the best rookie qb in years, Ben Rothlisberger. look where on earth those teams are immediately. and look where the raider are now.
What the Hell is wrong beside the Buffalo Bills?
Question:First they dump McGahee, then lose Fletcher and very soon Spikes?? They are really making it difficult to remain a fan. Although I go through 4 superbowls in a row so this isnt nil!
Answers:
I'm just as clueless as you are rotlfmao. I regard it's because they plan on rebuilding again.
They stink as a team? Just a guess.
I dream up the owner must be trying to tank the season and loose the follower base move the squad. Las Vegas and Las Angeles are looking for teams but the league wont tolerate a 33rd team enter (it would fold the scheduling and conferences). Only reason I can see since they traded or released their FOUR best players.
in attendance is some other people that close to other teams so they dislike the buffalo bills
I don't know what they are thinking Willis is a stud, and its not like they hold a good backup to bear over. The owner is to old and doesn't want to spend any money because they are contained by a very small open market. Those superBowls were along time ago find a unmarked team. Course I should articulate I'm a Titans fan.
They don't really hold the money for top management or push button players.the same problem lots of perennial losers own.
Nor is Buffalo a place where players want to live, work and angle their families for the love of it.
In certainty the Bills have done remarkably powerfully over the years, better than most, under the circumstances.
They own great fans.
Im a huge lover too. I think they are trying to be the foreign Arizona Cardinals. Fletcher was great , explicitly the worst move of many unpromising ones this off season . I suggest that they will be like the 1980's Toronto Maple Leafs , a laughing stock until the owner dies .
they've have an awful offesason, since i hate the bills i don't really contemplation, but if i were a bills aficionado i'd be pissed off. WTF are they doing giving away McGahee, and trading spikes. There merely dumb right now
They are trying to renovate, again.
It reminds me of the "fire sale" the Florida Marlins had after the 1997 World Series title. They get rid of anybody who was any righteous. Seems to me thats what Buffalo is doing, except they're doing it without any clear sense of direction of the squad. Had they kept the team surrounded by tact with a few more pieces added, they could enjoy contended in the tough AFC East. The lone thing they'll compete for in a minute is the battle for 3rd place surrounded by the division. Spikes has injury problems, so that make a little sense. You get hold of DT Darwin Walker in return, who is significantly underrated and be on a team loaded beside D-Line talent. To not resign London Fletcher-Baker was a discouraging move. He's not the fastest, not the strongest, but he produces at LB and he is durable. They couldn't afford to compete with the 49ers for Clements services, so it be a foregone conclusion he was gone. The McGahee trade baffled me, basically because they have not a soul in the backfield to replace him
whats not wrong wiht the buffalo bills would be a better and shorter press because if that was the press it would be easier to answer and the answer would be nothing
I live within Buffalo.
I agree with McGahee. When I moved here, it be like I stepped rear to 1980 and not in a angelic way -- surrounded by 2001. Definitely hit that "brick wall". Lots of empty run down buildings, lots of in recent times dead areas.
There is nought to do here. People are leaving adjectives the time. And it sucks. If I could move, I would.
He probably danced on the style out. I know I would.
I feel your affliction! I've been a die not easy Bills fan for a while very soon. To be totally honest I started liking them final when they went to adjectives the Super Bowls and have be a die hard lover ever since! Trust me there are NOT too abundant Bills fans within Souther California..
They need a LOT of give a hand! They have lost profoundly don't forget about N. Clement. My favorite players be London Fletcher and Takeo Spikes now they are both gone. All I can enunciate is it is a "rebuilding" process. We are replacing those LBs with childish players and we should draft a RB. I am NOT a believer in JP Losman and suggest we should have signed a big entitle QB. Give them a year or two and HOPEFULLY we will be back surrounded by the Playoffs and be a Contender in in the order of 2-3 years! A couple of years to let the young at heart players mature and become Pro Bowlers.
BILLS adjectives the way contained by 2010!!
I'm as clueless as you are. Their draft last year be totally bizarre too. I think their personnel decision lately are the 2nd worst in the NFL (behind solely the Detroit Lions).
They got rid of McGahee since he is not a devout character player, and didn't put forth full go every game. He did not delight in the city, and would not show up for team workouts, since he would to some extent be by himself in FL, away from the squad.
They lost Fletcher since he was going to constraint a large paycheck, and is getting elder. He is past his prime, and will slowly jump downhill, and I doubt the Bills wanted to settle up big money to someone who was not going to make at the level he did when they remunerated him.
They traded away Spikes since they did not feel he be ever going to return to Pro-Bowl form, and just close to Fletcher, did not want to pay him Pro-Bowl money when he be not playing like it. We very soon have a ton of DT that we can rotate out, and will hopefully enjoy a new linebacker from the draft.
If you regard as of a positive light, they hold done something they haven't done since the suberbowls.they are seriously working on their offensive strip. We have an amazing reciever within Lee Evans, and a QB (Losman) who will be pretty good next to the better line surrounded by front of him, and finally a full year of experiance. We also have a amazingly young defense, and RB are a dime a dozen in a minute. There are only a handful of team with a single running stern, while most have two or more.
There is a perfect future ahead for the Bills, it might not be this year, but I would expect the Bills to do better than second year.
McGahee sucked. Fletch was antediluvian. Spikes asked to be traded/released in February and is a shadow of his former self. I don't grasp you panicky sky-is-falling idiots. You demand switch from the Donahoe era, and then when Marv cleans up his mess, adjectives of a sudden this bunch of players who never got us anywhere is the piece that will cost us the Super Bowl. No wonder why family look down on the Bills, many of my fellow fan don't know a football from a helmet!
who knows really..i would enjoy let Fletcher move about...and no way they could hold matched the 49ers offer to Clements..but within must be something there that mcgahee and spikes didn't want to stay at hand..management, coaching who know.but it is time for them to rebuild, and i don't reckon they will be circling the wagons this year
Obviously Willis McGahee didn't hold the reputation nationwide he have here. To those who didn't know, he was a dick. He didn't come to workouts, he didn't remember plays, he whine about the location, he be not a leader. To those who said the Bills have no direction, you're wrong. The team is looking to build a strong squad with an actual factor of teamwork. They're getting guys that are skilful, but only if they are high-ranking character and leaders. The squad is young presently, but give this core 2 years and you'll adjectives be kicking yourselves for not believing.
Resolved Questions