Rugby Questions and Answers
Why is a rugby globe oval?
Question:Why not round like a football?
Answers:
I hear that by the day when William Webb Ellis first took the football beside his hands and started running forward (at the Rugby school). Balls be made with a pig bladder so they be not allways round as ppl wished. So when rugby separated from soccer the rugby players preferred those deffective oval ball for better handling and unpreditable bouncing making a funnier sport.
Esasier to handle.
Same Reason why American Football is Oval...
so you can corner it and run with it easier
Rugby is a activity. It is played with an oval shaped bubble which, if allowed to bounce, can become very unpredictable.
Rugby be invented at Rugby School in England within the latter part of the 19th centuary, when, whilst playing association football (soccer) one lad picked up the bubble and ran next to it, thus giving birth to a brand new team game! Apparently (... and this could well be some great urban myth) sooner or later, playing the rudimentary form of the aforementioned new winter sport, the ball get punctured and as it deflated they realised that they didn't really need an inflated, round bubble at all and that it be much more entertaining if a ball near pointy bits were used ... so they influence (whoever the hell "they" are!)
- hope that helps ... or at lowest entertains.
BECAUSE IT MAKES IT ALITTLE HARDER TO KICK. YOU WOULD HAVE TO CONCENTRATE TO KICK IT A CERTAIN WAY. IF THE BALL WAS ROUND YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO KICK IT WITH OUT EVEN THINKING WHICH SIDE TO KICK.
I'm usuall asked why it is so big. It's designed for handling, not long yard pass like an American football. The shape however alows it to be spiral passed when needed. Generally it is passed next to the pointier ends up and down to allow for easier catching. I'm no treally sure why there are threads, however human being a hooker I use them to line my fingers on during the stripe out throw in.
because you cant grubber near a round ball. it an unpredictable activity. you never know which way the orb will bounce.
Also, to kick a orb to get elevated so it goes over the poles. it own to be oval. Like a race motor. Airo dynamic. SEE?
Not only does it make a payment unpredictability to the game (and so masses others have said) but it fits without a flaw into the crook of your arm when you're running. Try sprinting 100 m with a soccer orb in your arms, consequently try it with a rugby globe.
On top of that rugby balls are easier to dropkick, punt, or place see...Now I'm not a soccer player, but can you do that many different types of kick to a soccer ball?
So why, you ask, next do we not play with something shaped similar to an american football, with its pointy edges and raise lacing down the side?
Simply because of sanctuary. Keep in mind that you're falling next to the ball contained by your hand, you're down on the pitch within the middle of the rucks, usually getting the ball ground into your facade and body...so would you want it pointy? No. How about the rough lace down the sides? Definitely not.
Footballs are, on top of that, designed for forward long pass, something that is categorically forbidden in rugby.
And explicitly that.
Cheers!
rugby balls be originally inflated pigs' bladders. over time, a man name gilbert revolutionized the globe and it resembled the modern ball. much next, the gilbert company made the ball what it is today. some countries at that time still played rugby near a round ball. the governing board after standaadized the shape to the modern oval. the oval ball is also easier to do a long spin overrun. try doing a spin pass next to a soccer ball..IMPOSSIBLE
Would i cause it within the rugby world??
Question:I weigh about 150lbs, 6 foot, i benched (last football season) 225lbs and squated 300lbs. I runa 4.9 40. but i freshly had surgury cuz i have a torn miniscus( knee) but im 100% and probably not as strong as i used to be. should i look into it??
Answers:
Nothing is impossible. U can make it if you concentrate on it and brand name it your goal. This world is not for dreamers but for achiever and always remember - NO GUTS NO GLORY !
if u hold any doubts u will DIE
sure,,go 4 it.only hav faith surrounded by god n believe in urself...n al d best..u wil succeed
Rugby is a young-looking man's game, so if you are lower than 25, no problem. If you're older than that, I suggest you confer it a miss, especially if you've never played rugby before.
But come to New Zealand and see how the team game is played in the rugby wherewithal of the world.
I'm had central knee surgery for torn Ligaments. I still play rugby, But if you haven't played up to that time go to some summer practices at your local club and see how you be in motion.
As it sounds like you would be a spinal column and you appear to have no rugby experience I surmise you are maybe setting your sights a touch high. Your physical attributes will not be your limiting factor but your ball skills and time to learn the spectator sport. Please tell me your aren't discussion about the 2007 world cup.
OK ... the first piece you need to know is that this is zilch like American Football! That may nouns obvious but I'll explain:
No lining!This means hugely careful commitment to tackle - you can hurt yourself badly doing it wrong
There is a position on the pitch for only just about any body shape and size. In my humble evaluation the world's best scrum-half (no9)is Peter Stringer of Munster and Ireland. He's about 5' 7", 75 kg(150lbs) and adjectives sinew and muscle. His help is speed - not so much in a straight vein but he's lightening fast and slippery as a really slippery point! And then you look at Jonah Lomu (Cardiff and ex New Zealand All Black) who is zilch short of a monster. At one time he had 48" thighs!! He's 6' 5" and does something close to 10 sec 100 metres ... tackling him have proved a problem for many an international player, buy it be Kenny Logan of Scotland who learned how to do it (Kenny is adjectives of 5'8") ...you just consent to him run over you and hold on to his ankles as he goes by (his legs be too big to get hold of)... graceful! Personally I think Kenny have either no brain or ball like melons!!
Knees do tend to suffer - tackle in rugby is more normally than not in that nouns and heavy bodies falling on the side of a leg can do horrible things to knees.
It is a unbelievably tactical game, played at step, so fitness and stamina are absolutely essential otherwise you run out of steam and the protestation score loads of tries contained by the last 15 minutes of the activity... and win.
It sounds from what little info you give that you should be looking at playing within the centre (no 10, 12 or 13) or at full back(no 15) but at no 10 you would be (traditionally)the kicker ... a really earth-shattering position with mega amounts of responsibilty. He's particular as fly-half and will always be the peak points scorer. On a good morning he'll save the squad and on a bad one he won't own any friends in the public house after the match! Check out Jonny Wilkinson (England and Newcastle) on-line for kicking technique ...he's undoubtedly (about the just thing that everyone who know anything about rugby does in fact agree on!) the world's best kicker, he has a phenomenal work-rate, though have had big injury problems brought roughly speaking by committed tackling on men much larger than himself and a in no doubt amount of cynical tackling by players who aren't accurate enough to acquire the better of him by fair method.
About the best thing you can do is find a cartridge of the Six Nations Championship or watch the European Championship games on Sky. Really swot up how the game works, and furnish it a go. If you're fit, corageous and prepared to train strong then in that is no doubt that you could do okay.
.and, at the risk of alienating the whole of the USA, I'd enunciate it's an infinitely better game than Gridiron!!
the best of luck to you
Yes and no. I am guessing your still beneath 20 and will put on some weight as you ripened physically. If you were a bit shorter, at your bulk you would have be a good hooker(like the interior in rime hockey, you have to win the scrum), but you grasp your ears and hair pulled alot. With your distance from the ground you could be good on procession outs(like a throw in, surrounded by soccer). Get your endurence up too, because their is no offence/defence/special teams within Rugby, you play the full game(unless you get hurt or hold a really bad hobby and the coach subs you). Wear a brace for your knee, most tacklers stir for the legs, unless your a big Samoan or Fijian and can stand someone up. Good luck, its a pretty decent activity.
I Play for a very sucessful RFC and it doesnt business your 40 speed. As long as your knee is up for it everyine can find a spot within the rugby world.
try to... if u don't feel immensely comfortable, leave... but first try. Do u enjoy a rugby club nearby??
The exquisiteness of the sport of rugby is that anyone with any physique can enjoy a go beside it. You don't have to be a giant and you don't hold to be extremely fast. If you're a big boy, you'll be a forward, and play directly against other forwards. Backs play against back. I would say that at 6 foot tall, you would be a correct wing. Try it out, mate...I did.
Can empire weigh underneath 130 pounds play sports close to rugby or row crew?
Answers:
rugby--if you are fast, later that can be an advantage.
row crew--if you are night light, yet highly strong, that can be an advantage.
anyway, do a sport because you love it, not because of your body shape.
SURE IF YOU CAN TAKE A HIT THEN YOU CAN PLAY RUGGY AND IF YOUR STRONG THAT WOULD HELP TO
Rugby is the world's most uncertain team activity : little blokes (like Pirrie deVilliers, the great Springbok scrum-half survived in the hoary days, and so did Daanie Craven)
and you can play amateur club rugby at the lower levels and still hold fun, but today at pro level, I don't presume such a size would get picked.
if you are rapid and agile and can take a hit try out for 7's rugby.
Absolutely - contained by rugby you tend to hit your opposite number the most, and positions are special more or less by size. The forwards adjectives tend to be large, but the scrum partially (#9) is usually shorter, though stocky, and the wings (#11 and #14) are usually slightly built and promptly.
Crew and rugby aren't terribly similar, but for crew, there's other cockswain.
Yes you could play scrum half or wing
yea sure you can play rugby, contained by NZ there is freight restriction rugby where adjectives players must weigh under 75Kg to be eligible to play and i.e. from the prop to the wing and the wing tends to be beneath 60kgs, dont let size be a factor for your passion for the game played within heaven.
I know surely nothing nearly rowing, but maybe you could be the Cox(the guy who yell "Stroke!" and sits at the front of the boat). In Rugby you'd be the perfect Hooker, he the little guy within the middle of the scrum that has to see the ball fund to his team. At 130lbs(60Kg) you'd be unforced to pick up, I hope your fast though at that size but for at the very lowest possible quick.
How big is your heart? That's adjectives that matters!
yes, i played rugby within college at 115 lbs. - i was delicate wing and inside center , the bigger girls couldn't catch me
any body can play rugby no mater what size
You are too small for rugby and rowing but you might be buoyant enough to be cox.
The aesthetic of rugby is that anyone can have a budge! Someone weighing lower than 130 pounds can play as scrum half. The scrum partly is the player who collects the ball from the ground and decide whether to pass it to the forwards (the big guys) or to the back (the fast guys). In this position you call for not worry nearly the big forwards, as these will be taken care of by your pack of forwards.
Have a step at it, mate! It's great fun.
Good luck
Has RUGBY get anything to do beside BUGRY?
Answers:
only when hopawati's involved
No, not a entity.
No bugry is probably a job where on earth you study and catch bugs but rugbt is a sport that invloves no pad and is played with a globe similar to a football but longer.
Notta
Yes there is as a situation of fact, both words use the exact same correspondence, just surrounded by different order.
Yes: their name are anagrams.
Resolved Questions