Tennis Questions and Answers
Hi i am john zacharia from kerala.i wanna be a tenis player.but my ancestral does not consent to me planning to run awa
Question:i wanna run away.to chenai or hyderabad or where ever.can any one give a hand me please.im otjoking i really wanna be a tennis player and ill sacrifice any item for it.but theree are inded economical probs etc.i wanna practsesome where thats adjectives i want some one please help.
Answers:
Im sorry.All I can read aloud is if you get to play anywhere dont lug it lightly. do alot of off-court training resembling running and strength training. Also do stretches.Concentrate on the tennis court.If you cant find someone to play with or the courts are taken practice against a wall. Just dont disturb anyone while practicing!
Check for a place to play on the internet. On running away I hold no comment. Its your decison.
Good Luck!
hey john are you in saudia arab? coz when i read your given name and state coz this fawzan hasan from 8th d iisdammam
Female Tennis players vs Male Tennis Players?
Question:Should they get equal recompense..?
I have notice there's a lot of have a chat that the Female Tennis players get smaller number fiscal payouts than the men.
The fact is, the Females play smaller quantity than the Men do. I understand that the first round of Wimbledon men play over 5 sets (first to 3) , be the Females play over 3 sets (first to 2)
Answers:
Male tennis is a faster and more intense sport. Females play at a slower pace (except Venus and Serena) not to mention the difference within match length. The bottom line is that tickets to womanly events do not sell as resourcefully and the prizes are given out accordingly.
Why shouldn't they catch equal pay, in recent times another example of sexism in our society :(
equal pay packet, the tennis is just as worthy
Woman look sexier in the outfits so they should definitly receive paid more becasue I will pay packet extra just to see if one of the little skirts fly up...
na
I chew over same tournaments, same pay.
Of course they should take equal pay, they do indistinguishable amout of training and work just as rock-hard as the men. The only plea they dont at the moment is because its probably all men on the board and they resembling nothing better than getting one up on the ladies
If it be based on an hourly rate, later the woman's champion get between 2 and 3 times the pay that the Men's winner gets.
Unfair? methinks Yes.
the war for equal pay for men starts...NOW!
I hope this help
Men play longer. If if men win every match contained by straight sets, the still only play duplicate as if a women went the distance every clash.
Women earn more money than men at grand slam events anyway, because they can enter both singles and doubles, and progress a long agency in both, because they hae a much lower workload.
Some tounaments the money is equal i believe. if you look at it this way, surrounded by the NBA and WNBA do they get rewarded the same amount or any other pro smooth sport. The men do have longer match as far as how many sets u own to win to win the match. So i am not going 2 right to be heard they should get equal retribution but there shouldn't be a big difference any.
The reasoning behind the prize money differences at tournaments is due to the following:
1. Men play more sets than women, and for this reason work harder and longer than the women do. The minimum number of sets a man needs to win to win wimbledon is 21, while a woman can win the tournament contained by just 14 sets.
2. Tickets to men's match sell more without delay and in greater volume than for women's match. Men draw bigger crowds.
3. Television and media coverage of tennis events is still focussed for the most part on the men. The men therefore generate more revenue for the medium.
4. Men are worth much more to advertisers than women, because they are on our tv more. This makes them a more expensive commodity than the women.
I'm sure most of us would agree that women's tennis should receive equal coverage in the medium and that as athletes they are just as worthy as the men, however you can't really argue beside the fact that the men own to play more sets than the women.
they should get equal PRIZE MONEY because women hold evolved and most of the contending is in the women's part...
So a few noteable women have started bleating how its "unfair" that men gain paid more than women, and the manly winner's purse at wimbledon is "lb30,000 m ore" than the women's purse. Sadly, Tony Blair has in a minute backed this.
Before everyone starts losing their head over this feminist machine, do we perfectionism to even analyse the figures? Lets do that:
1) Total Prize money for men = lb5,197,440
Total Prize money for women = lb4,429 440
Male winner's takings = lb655,000
Female winner's takings = lb625,000
From the above information, without any other factor, yes it looks like women are getting a bum operation, however, if we assume same number of entrants (128 men and 128 women as with this year's) and no tie-breaks are played:
2) Maximum number of sets played by men = 5
Maximum number of sets played by women = 3
Minimum number of sets played by men = 3
Minimum number of sets played by women = 2
3) Total prize money per set (male) = lb1,039,488
Total prize money per set (female) = lb1,476,480
Is it me, or did anyone only just notice the ladies purse perset achieve dramatically larger (by almost lb440,000) than the men's? Lets carry on.
5) Male winner's taking's per set (over maximum 5 sets) = lb131,000
Female winner's takings per set(over maximum 3 sets) = lb208,000
Male winner's takings per set (over minimum 3 sets) = lb218,333
Female winner's takings per set(over minimum 2 sets) = lb312,500
So we can clearly see, by playing a lesser amount of sets, women are in reality currently getting paid MORE to do smaller amount work. As this is these players main income, ie what they do for a lviing, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't profusely of women today currently protesting about unequal rate to male counterparts for doing like peas in a pod amount of work int he same job? Lets hear what Venus Williams have to say:
(Start of Quote)
"Women and men should be treated equally. This is an amazing sport and here is as much interest in women's tennis as here is in men's. Just because we can't play five sets because of our genes, what can we do?" (End of Quote)
So its settled after, I guess she means IF by some physical control (that no one have control over) men are subject to do more work, then wages is irrelevant and women should be REWARDED for their GENETIC INABILITY to do the same work, or better all the same, men should be PENALISED for their UNCONTROLLABLE ABILITY to do more work, amount of time playing should not matter, and number of sets played should not business.
I'm sorry, but this sounds like the feminist domestic device wanting to turn a situation COMPLETELY in its rather whilst penalising men, and at the same time, protesting within the name of "equality". Note how the "equality" angle solitary refers to pay, not the amount of work done to earn that income. Seems very convenient isn't it. I'm adjectives for equality, but when you start paying people for the sake of "keeping the sexes equal" whilst neglect the work done to earn that money (i,e a male department manager and a feminine office cleaner), whilst using the point of sex to disregard work done, later you're asking for trouble.
You will set a precedent that will end up self applied in ALL work places whereby women, irrespective of what they do or how long they do it, bring back paid duplicate as men who happen to do more, for longer and within POSSIBLY higher possitions of authority. I unquestionably wouldn't be happy to hear my9-5 receptionist get paid like peas in a pod as me if I was the CEO working 8-6. That would be a banter, I'd quit my job and work on reception: no responsibility, no accountability, no hassle.. SAME PAY.
"Oh women should draw from the same inflict they train just as much" - sorry, but boxers, manly OR female alike just get salaried when they fight and win, tennis shouldn't pay cheque ANYONE on the basis of trianing simply, otherwise I'd join, train and NEVER play tournaments and STILL capture paid.
Be convincing people, use your adjectives sense: if number of sets or duration of play is irrelevant, you might as well wage ALL the participants, irrespective sex, how long they play, how plentiful sets in adjectives they play, or how far they get. THEN that would be truly equal.
Yes, even though they don't I deem that they should! They play different but they are both GREAT!
When Playing hard by the lattice, can a player or the racquet cross the network?
Answers:
That is not allowed
nope
yes - the racquet can after it have made contact with the globe.
you can't touch the net.
no, The Net Is purely "Cyberspace" (Not Crossable By Whole Physical Molecules and elements) And A Player Or Raquet are such physical things.
HOPE THIS HELPS
nooo!
no
no...must keep the raquet on your side of the web at all times
No road. A player and the racquet has to remain bringing up the rear the net at adjectives times.
No. You cannot touch the net any or it is a disqualification of the point. If you cross or touch the net, you lose the point.
I scholarly that the hard road.
Yes but you must not TOUCH the net.
In regard to the question within the link I posted below:
* If I play a volley close to the lattice, hit the ball contained by my half of the court, but after allow my racket to follow-through and run over the net, am I penalize?
No, but again you must make sure you don't touch the web.
Read up before thumbing down dumb-*.
You cannot TOUCH the network, but your racquet CAN go over it as long as it's freshly the follow through. E.g. if you volley a ball on your side of the lattice, but your follow through goes over the web, BUT DOES NOT TOUCH IT, it is legal and you are not penalize. If you hit the ball on your opponent's side of the lattice or you touch the net, consequently you are penalized.
yes,the paddle can cross provided they hit the ball on their side first (Rule 25 e.)
What??
Of course the paddle can go over the lattice as long as it does not touch it.
I play and teach tennis and I hold seen it within so many tournaments. It is ok.
Never
It depends. What hobby are you playing??
Right presently have amelie mauresmo a girlfriend?
Answers:
I hear she's been seeing Martina Navratilova.
;-0
hell know...was looking but she have NO personal website:(
To my knowledge yes...
Why? U want to date her?
i dont know. I don`t know yes
all i really know is she's a lesbian..
though i kinda like her past girlfriend Pascale..
they really looked worthy together..
if she has one in a minute.. she's keeping her out of the spotlight.. =)
Her girlfriend is a woman named Sylvie Bourdon who be in the crowd at the Australian Open. I assume they are still together.
Her girlfriend is a woman name Sylvie Bourdon who was within the crowd at the Australian Open. I assume they are still together.
Sylvie and Amelie broke up years ago. She doesn't speak about her personal go on her website. I don't think she's seeing Martina Navratilova. They are simply aquaintances.
Resolved Questions