Tennis Questions and Answers
IF i utter Andy Roddick vs Roger..who win?
Question:compare them with the skills talent and character
appreciation
Answers:
its not even close, roger federer is playing some of the best tennis of his life, and when his occupation is over, he may turn out to be the best player of all time. if they be to play 10 matches this season, i would incredibly much be surprised if roddick won a single match
Andy Roddick!
=]
Uh, this doesn't HAVE to be hypothetical. For the most quantity, Federer wipes the floor beside Roddick. Occasionally Andy gets lucky but not vastly often.
powerfully,it's a relative answers...
Once a time Roger maybe win...
but at another time Andy possibly win too...
So,there will be not an genuine winner...
Federer dominates everyone, except Nadal on clay.
Once again no competition for Federer. He owns Roddick and you know it.
Roger win. Roger has Andy's number; they've met 13 times, or so, and Andy have only won once. He is clearly intimidated by Roger.
I would say Roddick because he is doing well-mannered this year and he is on target.
Andy's got a great serve but Roger have the complete game. So I will own to say Roger every time.
What the pont of this sound out. We all know who's going to win.
I'm not putting Andy down, because he is my favorite tennis player, but its going to purloin alot for him to beat Roger. He's come so close to whipping him. I know he can do it, its just that he cracks below Roger's pressure.
One day Andy is going to snap and overcome Roger. Something's going to click and Roger will not win. I hope its this year.
Edit - Roger rarely shows any reaction. Even in the conference room, he's get that same look.
Andy seems similar to a cool person. He's funny and pretty laid rear.
Skills= Andy Roddick has a more powerful serve. Federer is superior contained by every other way.
Talent= Both players are extremely consummate, but Federer has the snake when it comes to athleticism.
Character= They both seem resembling pretty good guys. Roddick seem like he have a better sense of humor, and Federer is more stoic. I would say this is the with the sole purpose category where they are equals.
ANDii RODDiCK BABii ! !
-vOn*ya
That's not even a contest! This have already been proven on the court numerous times. Even though I don't approaching him, Roger Federer would easily tap Roddick. Federer is the best player of all time.
roger is the best tennis player of adjectives time and heck he is only 25 years outmoded
roger
Er, did you not watch the OZ Open semi finals, where on earth Roddick was sent spinning out of orbit by TMF???
Oh My God, is that a concrete question? lol! as you would expect, Roger Federer! no questions asked. time of year.done.over.
federer wins
skills
roddick-good serve
federer-everything honest that is adjectives round game
character-
roddick-sometimes moore,sometimes sharapova,sometimes paris hilton.
federer-same girlfriend for 6 years and commonly humble but is getting a bit proud now surrounded by his interviews
Roger Federer.
Will Monica Selles ever return to professional Tennis?
Answers:
i dont think she'll know how to make it next to all the foreign and young talent (Sharapova, Henin- Hardine, etc.) but u never know it could develop!
Probably not. She is older presently, and her body won't endure as much as she used to but we hope so.
How long will it steal to revise tennis?
Question:I would very much similar to to play tennis on a regular basis but, I've never knowledgeable the sport. I started learning next to the help of a tennis insrtuctor this week.
Just wondering if someone know how often should I play per afternoon per week? Approx. how long will an average person rob to get the droop of the game?
I know everyone learn at different pace but, purely wanna get the jist of others experiance.
Answers:
You request for information is fair, but it sort of sets you up for misery! Tennis is a SKILL BASED sport. This puts it surrounded by the same catagory as study other skills like typing, reading, or driving a motor. It is true that the more you practice the better you get and the faster you'll swot, but you want to really stress QUALITY of instruction at the beginning. Tennis course are expensive, but you want to get put on the best walkway possible because bad customs in tennis are impossible to break- you don't want a friend who might be a polite player with no learning experience teaching you how to hit resembling they do. You want to find a teaching pro who speciallizes surrounded by PLAYER DEVELOPMENT. This person can put you on track to maximize your inherent ability and assure that you will become the best player you physically are practised of becoming.
Also remember that their are really only SIX shots surrounded by tennis. Once you are taking lessons and enjoy good fundamental strokes surrounded by place, go play as much as you can! Experiment and try to play match and compete. Every ball you hit increases you sensitivity to the orb (your "feel") and this will give your fundamental stroke more power, spin, depth, and accurracy as you verbs to play.
So to answer your question directly: you will never cram tennis to your satisfaction! Even Federer misses shots and i.e. the essence of the challenge inherent to the sport. You will have a feeling satisfied and comfortable with your playing even when your technique and skill level will allow you to maximize your athletic faculty in establish to win matches. Whatever even that happens to be depends on your athletic expertise, your competitive spirit, and your talent level. Enjoy the process of research the game the best you can! I've played adjectives the way up to the national plane and against players from all over the world and immediately I teach others how to play. I've never shown up to a court and feel like I didn't enjoy something to learn from my experience playing that afternoon! Have fun!
i think that you involve to play at least 2-4 hours a week
and you own to play in tournaments and so on
i hold tennis class once a week.individual...anyone...coa... is a very central factor to those beginner. formulate sure u r playing with someone who is sophisticated. practise make perfect..
You have need of to play at least 2 times a week but the more you play the better you will take, so play as much as you can.
AROUND A WEEK
BABE
IT I.LL TAKE SOME WHAT 12 DAYS
sorry it depends on u
how much u know the sport
onle depense on u
daily partially an hour for first week.Then daily one hour for subsequent two week. then 2 hour alternate light of day for one month.i.e 50-51 days needed to learn proper tennis.
dont carry excited.first try to learn step by step."slow and study win the race."if u cram step by step u can be able to have a handle on your mistakes and u can learn from them.so u can be unflawed.if u learn contained by hurry and over excitement you will not understand the mistakes and u will enjoy to repeat the same mistakes. ur coach know how many hrs a greenhorn shud play so don't worry.
To increase your study of the game, find a wall that you can hit against, and do that everyday for at least possible 30 to 45 minutes, make sure you any take programme for proper strokes or get a apt book that explains proper technique.
It took ME to learn it surrounded by 2-3 weeks 5 days a week !
it depends on how hard you work, and how flawless you want to be...
If you want to be an elite, you necessitate at least 5 hours a light of day...
At least 1 year to be commonplace (training by a tennis amatuer)
at least 4 years to play to a competitive height againts amatuers.
If you just want to swot up enough to gain the hang of it and know how to rally a bit, starting point with once or twice a week for an hour respectively time is a good start. That will probably thieve you around a month (give or take depending on you, of course). I be at a tennis camp for a week and within were a few general public who had never touched the sport since and they were competent to rally relatively consistently after the third or fourth time (3 or 4 hours per day). So it depends on how hard you want to work. It's not so rock-hard to get the swing of it just to assemble back and forth a bit, the difficult quantity is in perfect it - power, accuracy, consistency.
SHAROPOVA GOT HER BUTT KICKED,WhAT HAPPEN?
Question:I thought Serena was wash up and fat.
Answers:
Sharapova have been have terrible trouble near her serve lately. I don't think the pressure get to her, but she has be in a semi slump lately. Sharapova made it to the final because she is still so much better than the rest of the area, even with a bum serve. Serena go into this tournament 81st because she was injured for the better cut of last year, not because she be washed up and butter. If you recall one of her sisters be brutally murdered just over a year ago, so the slight counterweight gain she's had probably have been attributed to that. She is still an excellent player, probably about that and I am sure that even if Sharapova would hold been 100%, Serena still would hold beaten her(Serena have been within finals of majors many oodles times).
You thought wrong. I did think it would be a MUCH tougher contest. Not to minimze Williams' crack but Sharapova must have consent to the pressure get to her.
She be thinking about her subsequent commercial or magazine spread.
Serena is hungry again. That's all.
DO NOT UNDER-ESTIMATE WILLAIMS-SERIOUSLY!!!!...
Serena have a lot to prove after man injured an playing at half spend for so long. Serena beside her a game can and will be Maria at her best..Sharopava took a valid beating contained by every aspect of that match. she be over powered and her first and second serves were punished.
No...Sharapova is wash up! Look at her...WHAT A SHAME!!!!
Resolved Questions